Mumbai: Observing that false implications of a 48-year-old father cannot be ruled out, bombing a high court while giving anticipatory assurance Human says that the mother tried to tell her affection to her son to his son for the alleged incident this year so he could ask the provisions of ACT Pocso.
The parents of the 15-year-old boy were “divorced” in 2019.
“Instead, the story narrated in the FIR seems unreliable because there is no reasonable explanation to be delayed by FIR and about the suppression of the facts given by the applicant [accusing humans ], “said the court.
The court said that even though the woman claimed that she was supported by three brothers, there was no explanation for the Pending FIR.
“Alleged sexual violence against the Son in 2011, 2016 DLL was reported in 2021.
Father’s love for children tried to relate to 2021 incidents to request Pocso provisions.
Allegations are not supported by medical evidence,” said the court.
The High Court also said that the relationship of men with other women, at this stage, cannot be called ‘illegal’ as the second marriage under the religious law requested by the Parties permitted.
“But for baldness, there is no evidence found to prove the same thing.
Despite the above, it should be noted that in March 2019, the applicant [accusing humans] claimed to have given Talaq to the complainant and it was later, the old problem was planted by the complainant for Registration of violations, “said the court.
It shows that despite divorce, the man and woman lived together until March 2020.
The man, a public servant, moved a high court after the Pocso Court specifically rejected the pre-arrest application in June.
The man’s lawyer, Madhukar Dalvi, handed over that the entire FIR 2021 will be fully cooked when it was reflection, because the man had given a divorce in March, 2019.
Dalvi proposed that the FIR was eight years old for those who had no convincing explanation.
The couple estranged married in 2001 and had two children.
The woman, in her complaint, also accused a man of domestic violence, dowry abuse and had an extra wedding affair.
It was also claimed in 2011 and 2021, touched his son inappropriately.
However, the court said that “is required to note that adult children have never complained about alleged incidents to others than complainants.”