Mumbai: Making observations such as the victim’s family’s name and fame was lowered because of the incident “, a court judge who was punished and sentenced to a 28-year-old man to harass sexually and persecuted his neighbor by sending it a fly kiss and verbally and physically misused when he objected to his behavior .
The court noted that regardless of all obstacles, the woman mobilized courage and entered the witness box and underwent a cross-examination exam where she was accused of having an affair with her.
However, the court said it was a unilateral love and that was the motive of the defendant.
“There is no soft view that can be shown in the defendant because the same thing can be converted into a big or very serious violation.
In addition, the family’s name and fame of the informant (ED) fell due to the incident,” said the Magistrate Kurla court.
The court did not allow accusations of Shaikh Shaikh (28) to be released on a good bond of behavior under the period of rebel the violator acting instead of serving a sentence.
“In the instant term, the defendant has committed a very serious violation, because the same thing is contrary to a woman.
The provisions of Part 354 IPC are put in place to maintain public morality and proper behavior.
Therefore, if there are people who use criminal power to a woman With the intention or knowledge that the politeness of women will be angry (section 354), the benefits of the trial period cannot be expanded to him, “said the court.
On June 14, 2019, at 9am, Survivor’s parents went to work.
According to prosecution, the defendant came to the door of his house and began sending flying kisses and making a rough movement.
Survivor said the accused of leaving.
Angry, the defendant misused it in a dirty language.
He then caught his hand and dragged him out.
Survivor and his brother screamed help.
The neighbors gathered.
Then accused then pulled it to steal and touch it inappropriately.
The police were called and the defendant was arrested.
The court denied defense claimed that survivors and was accused of having an affair and because of the fight he misrepresented him.
“Defense brings no evidence to his defense except only with suggestions rejected by informants and witnesses.
One cannot reach the conclusion that this complaint was submitted by informants under pressure and after a fight.
Thus, the defense defense is not only impossible to be trusted but also Flimsy, “said the court.
(The identity of the victim has not been disclosed to protect his privacy in accordance with the direction of the Supreme Court about cases related to sexual violence)