Mumbai: Twenty-nine years after a Goregaon resident was killed at home by giving 65 injuries with Chopper, the defendant, now 58, has been released by the session court that observes that the possibility that the evidence cannot be ruled out.
Suresh Jamsandekar, a resident of Bhandup, has fled for almost three decades and captured only this.
“On the basis of doubtful evidence, the court cannot come to the conclusion of the guilt accused of being proven without doubt,” said the court.
Five accused of being accused of being released in a separate trial in 2004.
The court said the statement of acceptance of the guilt was accused of being released, unacceptable as evidence accused of other cogent evidence.
“The story of the prosecution of the making of a memorandum statement by the defendant Vijay (Jadhav) itself is doubtful and not accepted by this court,” said the court.
It added that creating false evidence in the form of a statement made doubt about integrity and bonafids from prosecution.
“Therefore I feel that the benefits of doubts must be given to the defendant,” said the court.
Rajendra Khade was found killed in his flat on December 26, 1992, after the guard found blood dripping out of the main door.
He immediately told the housing community officials and Fir fired in the Goregaon police station.
The robbery was believed to be a motive, with the golden ornaments belonging to the victim recovered from the gold shop.
But the court found that the invoice related to the purchase by the shop owner was “suspicious”.
“There are four different weed articles and, so, there may be five receipts each of Rs 8,000.
It creates doubts in receiving these documents to become genuine,” said the court.
About 10 witnesses continued during the trial.
Among them are guards, victims, employees of jewelry stores, police and medical officers.
Interestingly, you told the court that his family did not want victim property.
“I could clearly see sadness on the witness’s face when he made a voluntary statement.
The possibility is that the deceased must have a criminal record, therefore, his brother does not want the property, may be obtained illegally,” the court said.
It adds that when passing orders at the disposal of property, it will keep his desire.