Mumbai: A battle for a decade of divorce recently ended with a happy note with the husband taking his wife’s house after his 12-year-long ‘detention’ in a mental health hospital so that a judge.
The family court in Bandra, in December, also recorded his own struggle to get a review board to assess and get a woman released, seven years after the hospital had run out, but her husband refused to take him home.
“This is the case, where only because the wife was not permitted at the wedding house, she had to languish in a mental hospital for more than a decade even after the debit,” said the Swati Chauhan family court judge.
The pair was married in 1993.
In the men’s application about the wife’s mental health, a metropolitan judge in 2009 passed the ‘order receipt’ based on what he was sent to a mental hospital.
In 2012, her husband filed a divorce lawsuit on the grounds of “cruelty and unsoundness of mind”.
Chauhan Judge heard the case for the first time in October 2021.
“Minister of Health Act 2017 announced to protect, promote and fulfill the rights of the person while giving birth to mental health and services and things related to him.
However, this court found it difficult To search and hand lay a health review of mental boards.
Unfortunately, respondents cannot benefit from the new law and he melancholy continues, “said the command of the family court.
The court said in 2014, the medical supervisor, in accordance with the law, had ordered a female discharge when he was found fit.
Wife and nurse were sent home, but husband “refused to look after her at the wedding house” and she was ‘detained’ in a mental hospital.
The court said, “This is a classic example of how the sequence of acceptance is misused to truly expel a wife from a marriage house and then limit her back”, and said it was “most surprised” on the grounds that the divorce case was delayed.
The court said it was “equally disturbing” that no one was examined when he was in the hospital, both his son behind the main, or his brother.
His initial husband said he would house him in a shelter’s house and bear all costs.
But the court advised him, who said he would find a house for him nearby.
But on November 27, when the court was directed direct discharge, he said he would take him home.