Murder, the cost of riots in seven in the case of Delhi Riots – News2IN
Delhi

Murder, the cost of riots in seven in the case of Delhi Riots

Murder, the cost of riots in seven in the case of Delhi Riots
Written by news2in

New Delhi: The City Court has faced the allegations of murder and riots of seven people in a case relating to the death of a man during Riot Delhi northeast, saying Prima Facie there is enough material to continue.
Additional session Judge Vinod Yadav frame of murder, riots, riots with deadly weapons, assembly that violated the law and criminal conspiracy against Kashyap, Arun Kumar, Ashish, Devender Kumar, Pradeep Rai, Krishan Kant Dhiman and Rahul Bhardwaj.
This case was related to the alleged murder of a monish, who had died after being allegedly attacked by a horde of riots in the Dayalpur area when he returned after meeting his father and carrying sweets.
“I am from the opinion considered that the prime facie, there is enough material in the record for the frame costs of all those accused under the necessary part,” said the judge in the order.
However, the court added that prosecution could not set the material in connection with violations of disobedience in the order of public servants, damage that caused fifty rupees, damage to fire or explosives with the intention to destroy the house, etc.
Provisions relevant from prevention of property action damage The public, 1984.
The court said that even though the people accused were not visible / seen in CCTV recordings / video clips, at this stage, it had the ocular evidence of witness prosecution (PW).
“I found a substance in the submission of special PP which was not a ‘statue’ that only lay quiet in one place and vice versa Bonafide could not be doubtful at this stage because he had made a call to PCR, the contemporaries of the incident commission time in this problem,” he said , All defendants claimed they were involved in this problem.
In connection with the opposition to the accuser’s advisor that they were not visible / seen in any CCTV footage, the court said it found the substance in the submission of the public prosecutor that rioters had destroyed almost every CCTV around it and damaged the DVR thus, it was very possible that on this account did not There are CCTV recordings available in this problem.

About the author

news2in