New Delhi: The Delhi government on Thursday to Delhi High Court that his new excise policy 2021-22 aims to minimize corruption and provide fair competition in the trade of liquor and that all worries against it are just fantastic.
The AAP government also said that there was a full-scale attack for this problem and that replies would be submitted to make it clear.
Some petitions have been submitted challenging new excise policies before the High Court which previously refused to accept fixed orders.
When a fresh request appeared to hear on Thursday, the Chairman of the Chairman of the Judge DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh issued a notice and searched for replies from the Delhi government and the central government.
It does not provide any order to stay or expand the July 20 deadline to apply for a tender under the policy.
When one of the advisors who opposed the policy stirred that in new policies that divided Delhi to 32 zones, only 16 players who could be permitted in the market and would lead to the monopoly, the bench said the control was for public well-being and not for their liquor business , “Control is for public welfare and not for you to run your business.
This is public in general.
It is not intended for you to run your business or make your difficulties,” Bench said.
Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing the Delhi Government, proposed that “there is a full-scale attack on us.
I will reply.
The policy minimizes corruption, giving fair competition.” Because the court heard the first challenge against the policy on July 12, eight petitions had come before Different benches, Singhvi together with Delhi government stand advisors, Santosh Kumar Tripathi said adding that the petition was fine -versed in the liquor business.
Courts are hearing new challenges for new excise policies by Towers and Promoters Ashiana Pvt Ltd and Rajiv Motors Pvt.
Ltd., which accused that it was illegal, unfair, arbitrary and violations of Delhi excise.
2009.
Advice Sanyam Khetarpal, appears for two companies, saying “32 zones will lead to 16 players on the market.
Where else will go?” The petition also tried to cancel the e-tender notification on June 28 from the Delhi government, prescribing the procedure It must be followed for wise electronic offers zone that invites the giving 32 licenses of the retail relief zone to supply Indian and Foreign Liquor brands in Indonesia the capital of the country.
The court also issued a notification and asked for a reply from the Delhi government on the petition by Anita Chaudhary, a wholesale license holder of liquor in Uttar Pradesh.
Advocate Sanchar Anand, appears for Chaudhary, argues that policies are outside of power that makes government power under Delhi excise acting and violating Article 14 of India’s constitution.
He said his client challenged the feasibility criteria to have at least five years experience to apply the L-1 wholesale liquor license based on the policy.
“Wholesale, trade in liquor is actually very simple and does not require special technical knowledge or skills, less 5 years of experience.
There is no other country in India except Delhi states insist 5 years of license experience of liquor for all sales.”, Said the petition , While the petition by the company will be heard on August 9, the Chaudhary petition will be heard on August 27.
On Monday, the bench refused to continue to carry out new excise policies and issued a notification to the Delhi government on the petition by Readymade Plaza India Pvt Ltd, a group of retail liquor vendors.
Senior advocate beat Rohatgi, representing Readymade Plaza, said that by new excise policy, Delhi will be divided into 32 zones and one can bid for two zones and policies will lead to a complete monopoly of several big players.