Mumbai: Badi the Bombay High Court headed by Justice S S Shinde on Friday took back “personal comments” on the work of Pastor Stan Swamy, a defendant in the case of Parishad Elgar who died in the hospital, after Nia’s advice on objection.
“If you think I said something, I took the words back,” said the judge after an additional lawyer General Anil Singh, appeared for Nia, said, “After your divinity passes comments …
moral agency is affected.” Singh had searched for two minutes at the end of the trial in the Swamy case to make “submission not connected with the benefits of the problem”.
He said “personal or personal comments from the bench, especially in the open court in a delayed investigation, got twisted …
(especially) personal comments about the work of the defendant”.
In this case, Judge Shinde said: “I have said as far as legal issues, it is a separate problem.
‘” That “is very balanced and” the court effort to balance “, he said, before adding:” No problem, I took back what Even what I said personally.
“Swamy, 84, an activist of tribal rights, was charged with anti-terror violations for allegedly becoming a Maoist and was arrested last October.
In May, he shifted to the Holy Family Hospital from Taloja Prison with HC’s orders, waiting for hearing at the defense of his medical guarantee.
He died on July 5 at the ICU Hospital.
Explain that his comments are not connected with the benefits of criminal cases against Swamy, the bench added: “Even we are human.
When something happens suddenly …” However, telling Singh: “We, without uncertain conditions, admiring You.
We have never seen you personally attached to this problem.
“During hearing, Swamy’s advice Mihir Desai raises four problems.
One of them is to seek participation of FRAZER Mascarenhas, through lawyers, to participate in judicial investigations for Swamy’s death; To ensure an investigation under the provisions of the criminal procedure code is carried out in accordance with the NHRC guidelines; Because he swamy died in Mumbai, to appoint a judge from the city; And, finally, to send a report to a complete HC.
For Nia, Singh said he did not mind the CRPC mandate that was followed and the investigation was being carried out, but he said since the Swamy appeal before HC opposed the collateral rejection by the court of trial, they would stand with “poor death ‘.” In this case, Desai said There are various SC decisions that talk about HC that have the power of ‘parens patriah’ or to be their guardians who cannot speak for themselves.
HC is looking for compilation and a problem of desire to rise and whether HC can hear this problem and postpone until August 4.