Ahmedabad: With the misuse of the anti-land law that has just been implemented followed by Pasa Prayer in a private property dispute, the Gujarat High Court on Wednesday said that there is no need for people to rent proons because of the serving law.
Judge Paresh Upadhyay made this scathing comment while saying the assessment of the petition submitted by four people from Amreli Regency, which was detained by the prevention of anti-social activity laws (PASA) after being ordered under the related land grabbing law (prohibition) with property disputes.
Canceling Pasa Orders, the judge warned the state government in favor of the parties in private property disputes, one day the land was in a shameful position.
He also pointed to the danger of corruption practices, the laws of new land seizure tended to bring.
HC orders rang, “enthusiasm in the part of the country’s authority to dispose of the weight of the country that supports one of the contests, in terms of personal property disputes, can land the state in a shameful position.” The court further said, “In a property dispute,” The financial pegs from both parties may be very high.
It can also cause temptation to one of the parties, for asking for assistance from income and police officers, for consideration of the Less Known Law.
“The court further said,” In a property dispute, the second peg The parties may be very high.
It can also cause temptation to one of the parties, for asking for assistance from income and police officers, for consideration of the Legally Known Law.
This is a danger that needs to be guarded by higher state authorities.
“While reading the part of the order , Upadhyay justice commented, “You (the government) will be put in the post Fill embarrassing, if you really feel embarrassed at all.
” He went ahead, “People now stop recruiting thugs.
File FIR, begging for land and getting land.
People are behind the bar even for registered sales deeds.” The Judge has criticized the use of arbitrary land seizure laws followed by Pasa.
In this case, which involved two female hutment officers too, the court was critical of the use of the detention power of the district government.
The court quoted a written statement from government officials, where the reason why pasa was forced and why a woman was not externally described.
He told the court that if the woman was external, he could still get legal advice from lawyers and could continue his illegal activities.