New Delhi: While the use of three people accused of in the case of the Northeast Delhi riots, the city court on Thursday said police failure to carry out the right investigation was “colossal” and “criminals” time and taxpayer money.
This adds that when history will look back at Delhi’s worst communal riots since the partition, police failure to carry out the right scientific investigation will “definitely torture the guardian of democracy”.
The court said he could not allow such cases, taking a valuable judicial time when it was a “open and closed” problem.
Additional Judge Vinod Yadav said the type of probe was carried out and the lack of supervision by Superior officers clearly showed that the investigation institute only tried to attract wool above the court’s eyes and nothing else.
He said he was sad to note that there was no real / effective investigation that had been carried out and only by recording police statement Gyan Singh, who was also in a late stage, especially when the defendant had been detained in another case, the police had just tried to show the case as “Ask”.
“The evidence brought to a very difficult record to frame the accusation of the defendant,” observed.
After a long investigation, the police only showed five witnesses, one became a victim, another police officer, a task officer, a formal witness and investigating officer.
The court issued Shah Alam, Rashid Saifi and Shadab of all charges related to alleged vandalism, looting and cutting the shop one Harbreet Singh by a horde.
It noted that there were a large number of defendants who had been in prison for the last 18 months or more just because the trial in their case had not yet begun and the police seemed to be busy archiving additional chargesheets.
“The valuable judicial time of the court was wasted in providing dates in these cases.
Many times are being consumed by cases such as now, where almost no investigations carried out by the police,” the court observed.
The judge said the case seemed to have resolved only by submitting a chargesheet without a real effort made to track eyewitnesses, real evidence and technical evidence.
“This is not interesting for the senses that no one witnessed a large crowd of rioters when they were in the vandalism destroyer, looting and burning,” he added.
“The complaint was needed to be investigated with enough sensitivity and skills, but lost and recorded Constable Singh’s statement on March 3, 2020 was the ‘all and end all’ of the investigation,” said the court.
Down a lot to the police, the court said, “The victim in this problem is the pain and suffering suffered by the amblainant / victim, whose cases have remained unsolved, call investigations and slow, lack of supervision by superior officers and criminal waste time and taxpayer money .
“The court noted that even after receiving two written complaints, the police did not start investigations until March 2, 2020, for reasons known by them.
Suddenly, on March 3, 2020, the police “appeared in the picture and IO jumped over the opportunity” to record his statement and consequently arrested the people accused of Mandoli prison.
It added that silence and delay were not only fatal in this case, but also gave the impression that the police had “planted / introduced” to “solve this case.
Other observations are that the defendant has not been specifically mentioned in FIR, there are no specific roles assigned to them, no recovery of anything made, no eyewitness accounts are available on records and no CCTV recordings or confirmed video clips.
on the scene.
There are no ingredients to show that they have participated in a criminal conspiracy.