Prasagraj: Taking a serious note about the non-compliance of orders by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd (IOCL), the High Court of Allahabad on Monday directors some responsible officers to appear before September 30 regarding the repair of responsibility for compliance with orders that are passed by the court this.
“In addition, he will also provide a procedure for compliance with this court order, details of petitioned insulting petitions on officials of respondents and actions taken against people responsible for non-compliance or delay in this court order,” added the High Court.
Hearing the disgusted petition submitted by one brijbhan Yadav, justice Prakash Padia observed, “it was seen that a large number of insulting petitions were being put forward against Indian Oil Corporate Officials (IOCL) for the non-compliance with orders passed by this court from time to time.
This fact shows that this fact Indian Authorities Oil Corporation Ltd does not take serious orders authorized by this court, which results in a large number of disgusted petition submissions.
“The court directed the court (compliance) of this court to communicate this command to respondents through the Head of the Judge (CJM), Varanasi.
The court also directed CJM, Varanasi to communicate this command to the opposite party (IOCL) on Tuesday.
The court was directed to put up this case as fresh on September 30 for the next hearing.
In the current insulting petition, the applicant has stated that he has submitted a written petition that challenges letters / notifications on 1, 2020 February 2020, rejecting the candidacy of the applicant for giving the gas station and the license.
The High Court has been on March 5, 2020, directed the applicant to approach the competent authority of oil companies within four weeks.
The court has directed the corporation to consider and decide the application of the applicant with a reasonable command and spoke within six weeks before completing the selection in connection with any third party.
While hearing the current insulting petition, the court found, after reading the note, that until now there was no last command that was passed by the authority concerned in this matter.
Therefore, while noting it seriously, the court issued direction above.