Mumbai: In some relief for the Bollywood Shilpa Shetty-Kundpa actor, the Bombay High Court on Friday said that one TV channel based on the need to reduce the video content observed by the High Court “clearly describes duplicates at the personal level” and recorded the other two, a “journalist Online “and a number of online entertainment channels have been removed by themselves, after serving a defiation settings submitted on Thursday by celebrities.
Both did not upload them back.
Judge Gautam Patel who passed the order, however, said “There is no part of this command that must be interpreted as a joke on the media except for two-three examples mentioned.” Shetty has made 29 defendants crossing print online, electronics, social media, websites, 29 are people John Doe – who are harmed by “wrong” and “evil” information to him and her husband.
The application for the alleged interim assistance is to increase their own viewers and reduce the mind of the person against the couple during the density inquiry into a case where her husband Raj Kundra has recently been arrested.
About the TV channel above, HC after hearing his advice of the Nerve Birendra and Abhinav Chandrachud, the depiction in the July 26 video, “beyond the limit …
and needs to be lowered.” “I believe some of the problems caused by this lawsuit will require closer supervision because it is not possible to say at this stage that all the same statements with defamatory character,” Justice Patel said as he dictated his command.
Nerves, laid it, urged the request for some cases – from between 20 odd-odd quoted.
HC Judge said, “This does not mean that I have rejected his request by considering others also does not mean that he has acknowledged the case with …” HC, however, there is no observation or command for alleged content in the online portal that says it ” directly related to the investigation “in this case.
One of the two who took content had questioned the quality of the care of Shetty in considering his children who said nerves to overcome this as “evil and slandered” and ignored his fundamental rights as “involving his personal family life and that his children were intrusions Obviously in privacy ” “That added,” Nothing involves or must be allowed to be involved.
Shetty as a parent.
The aspect of his life is protected by privacy rights.
The consideration in defamation and broad protection recognized under the freedom of the press must be balanced with privacy rights.
There is a possibility of exception For freedom of speech must be very narrow adjusted but it is not possible to recognize the right to privacy and to say it is because someone is such a public figure (giving up) the right to privacy.
” HC noted, “he had taken the video and took it and took it left and Will not be uploaded again.
” HC said TV channels and online entertainment channels “It seems to me to be even in the interim stage this is dangerous …
Of course Shetty hasn’t been contacted for his comments.” HC said his lawyers showed that “At least there are some comments on some media outlets It is slander and cannot be said to be protected as a ‘fair reportage’.
They also do shetty rights for privacy in one or two cases.
“It also said that one of the defendants said he was” online journalists and also claimed as Shetty’s friends who are now possible to be something from the past.
“HC called for a reply from all the defendants on August 18 and a single comprehensive Roboinder from Shetty on August 26 and will hear the problem again on September 20.
HC said other parties must be heard before any decision can be taken.
Shetty has been issued.
To report “crying” and HC during hearing observed nerves that “if done before the outsiders and third parties in a matter of some public concerns.
The fact that he cried and against how it was defamation that, “added” this very thin line ‘.
The judge also verbally observed that these aspects might involve “more nuanced’ interaction points from the interaction between personal rights and constitutional and need to enter later.
One video in Shilpa needs to be lowered: HC
