Thiruvananthapuram: The government and opposition were involved in heat exchanges at home on Thursday for the Supreme Court verdict in the case of Ruckus assembly.
The minister of Pinarayi Vijayan, who citated examples of previous disruptions in the assembly in various countries, argued that dragging problems in the house to court would only determine the wrong precedence, while the opposition was against all things had been considered by the previous court.
It reaches its conclusion.
Oppo leader V D Satheesan said the cm holder numbered challenging court ruling.
Vijayan quoted as many as 12 incidents of commotion in various legislators in this country, and argued that in the case of these cases were dragged outside the home for consideration of the criminal justice system.
The problem was resolved in the house, he said.
UDF has tried to introduce certain practices that have never been heard before, he said, “The government tries to enforce the privilege of home members.
The effort to withdraw cases in such things is not new.” He said the opposition’s views that The general policy taken by all other legislative assemblies does not need to be done for legislature Kerala will only help underestimate the dignity of the house.
Sathean said CM must demand Sivankutty’s resignation on moral reasons and for the sake of democratic values.
It was ‘illegal’ for him to justify the case that the Supreme Court had refused to accept, he said.
“The main minister questioned the court’s assessment.
He commented as if he was not satisfied with the decision and this problem must be referred to the full bench,” Satheani said.
Quoting cases of former forest minister K P Viswanathan and former Finance Minister K M Mani, opposition leader said they both had resigned because the verdict was released against them.
In the case of Sivankutty, the court has asked him to face the trial, he said.
Furthermore, Sathean said the constitution gave members privileges to talk only to speak without fear and vote in the assembly.
He said such privileges should not be misinterpreted for a license to enjoy criminal activities.
“Anyone who committed a crime must face the trial.
In addition, trust in the justice system will disappear.
The government goes to cancel the trial in this case to damage the public nature, again using public money.
In fact, the cost for this case must be borne by political parties.
And not the government, “he said.
Opposition members caused slogans demanding the resignation of the minister in the house after speaker M B Rajesh refused permission for the delay movement based on the explanation of CM.
The opposition boycotted the process for that day and held a protest at the main entrance of the assembly complex.