New Delhi: Request for a complete ban on sales, storage, and the use of firecrackers in the National Capital as long as Diving is mentioned for an urgent hearing before the Delhi High Court on Friday that says “will see”.
The High Court has been on Thursday registering a petition to hear further on December 13 as the main advisor for the applicant was not available.
But advocate urged the bench to hear it on Friday itself or Saturday with reasons that would not be infrared.
The High Court will rest for diwali holidays starting 1 to 5 and Saturday is the last working day.
Chairman of the Judge D N Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh asked for advice to give a case number to the court teacher and will see when it must be registered.
“You give a case number, we will see.
We don’t say yes or no.
We’ll see at the end of the day,” Bench said.
Gautam Jha advocates, appeared for the applicant, said his requests opposed the complete ban on sales, storage and firecrackers in Delhi during Diwali on November 4 and if this problem was not heard before the festival, it would become an infructus.
The High Court, on Thursday, has noted that the same thing related to the ban on manufacturing and selling firecrackers throughout the country to curb pollution is also delayed in front of the Supreme Court.
The High Court heard the request by two individuals, Rahul Sanwariya and Tanveer, who had claimed that the Delhi government’s decision to impose a total ban was “rare” because the APEX court never ordered a fire extinguisher on the internet the capital city of the country.
The applicant said they were looking for modifications from September 15 which imposed a complete ban on storage, sales, and exploded from all types of firecrackers during the Diwali festival due to pollution problems.
Instead of absolute prohibitions, the authorities must choose green crackers or multilevel regulations, previous advice said.
The applicant has argued that the prohibition is arbitrary, unreasonable and excessive.
“The action of respondents (Delhi government) should not be more disturbance than what is needed to fulfill important public goals.
No doubt, Article 25 of the Indian Constitution is subject to Article 21 and is not contested by the applicant, however, submitted by the applicant that the extent of the respondents The decision / order is disproportionate with the final.
The purpose and purpose, namely, to curb pollution in the NCT of Delhi, “said the petition.
He claimed that pollution in Delhi was caused by vehicles, burning biomass etc.
and a complete ban on firecrackers, one and a half months before the Diwali festival, had hurt the sentiments of millions of people.
Petasan Prohibition: Request in Delhi HC Looking for an urgent hearing
