Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday seeks an independent comprehensive report from the Civil Aviation Secretary of the Bansal Rajiv Civil Aviation on the Problem of the High Permit given to the Over-Ground Railway Project in Mumbai.
HC bench from Chief Judge Datta and MS Karnik said, “Bansal will also consider aspects of public safety and security, which lives around Juhu Airport, and throws light whether commissioning the Metro MMRDA rail line (Metropolitan Regional Development Authority) will affect aircraft operations at Juhu Airport.
” Postponed Public Interest Litigation (PIL) Challenges NOC for Metro Line 2b to February 28, HC allows MMRDA to “bring on preparation work for Metro Rail Lines, Geotechnical Investigations and Utility Idilitas ” Until Orders further and clarified” Apart from the preparation work, there is no other work that can be done without time off before the location MMRDA for the construction of the Metro Rail line over-ground inside F Unnel Zone on the short east 1NAN and take off the average runway 26 and 08, from Juhu Airport.
NOC contradicts the ministry (limitation of altitude to maintain aircraft operations), 2015, submit an advisor to Nishant Thakkar.
Pills expressed concern losing the lives of accidents if the MMRDA metro line was assigned.
The train corridor comes from DN Nagar, Andheri (West) to Mankhurd.
Courts, after hearing Counsel Aai, Sandeep Marne, and the state of Advocate General Ashutosh Kumbhakoni wanted to know whether NOC was in accordance with the rules.
Observing that because it does not have the expertise to check the technical involved “but at the same time the concern increases …
in this pill it seems serious”, HC asks for help from an expert in civil aviation.
“Therefore, we propose that the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) …
can be asked to examine the worries raised by the Petitioner in the light of his complaints of violations of the provisions of the AAI and their concerns loss of life produced from the accident, if the Metro Rail line MMRDA is assigned.
‘ ‘However, Thakkar’s advisor took him to a court notice that Arun Kumar, who is the powerful DGCA, is at the relevant time point of standby.
The Joint Secretary (airport), the Ministry of Civil Aviation, and that he was involved in the decision-making process that led to the issuance of NOC which was revealed.
Thus he asked to replace DGCA by Secretary, civil aviation, received by HC after Kumbhakoni and Marne did not mind.
HC directed that Thakkar and DP Singh, advocates for the central government would lead to the notice of the Secretary, the Ministry of Civil Aviation.