Chennai: In a sharp reaction to the Governor of Tamil Nadu R and Ravi returned the liberation bill to the assembly speaker, Minister M K Stalin made a significant reference to the founder of DMK C N Annadurai opposed the need for governor’s shipments.
“On the 53rd anniversary of Anna, I reflect on the future’s view and valuable questions’ Does a goat need a beard and the state as governor?” Stalin said in a tweet along with a detailed statement about the action of the Tamil Nadu government further in response to the governor’s actions in returning the bill to the MPPAVU speaker.
The government will analyze the governor’s view and explain the real facts behind Neet, Stalin said.
In New Delhi, members of the DMK and Congress walked out of Lok Sabha, demanding that the governor be recalled again.
The DMK floor leader R Baitu expressed shocked at Ravi’s decision, argued that it was against the interests of the southern students, especially poor students and those from rural areas.
Members of the DMK and Congress entered the well, raising a slogan against the governor.
Agriculture Minister Narendra Singh Tomar said the role of constitutional authority such as the governor should not be discussed at home.
DMK members and Congress walked out.
TMC (M) The leader of G K va-san, in a statement, urged the state of the state and trade unions to act appropriately to end the deadlock over the problem of Neet, by remembering the welfare of the students.
MNM State Secretary Murali Appas said the Governor of TN had “insulted the Tamil Nadu People’s Sentiment”.
The TNCC leader said, after postponing it to the President for four months, the governor has now returned it to the state government.
“It really contradicts the interests of the people of Tamil Nadu,” said Alagiri.
He said the governor’s actions amounted to destroying the future of children from people who were less able and marginalized.
“This means that it ruins TN assembly,” he said.
PMK Youth Wing Leaderanbumani said, “Governor’s explanation that the release of Neet against rural students is unacceptable.
His establishment is contrary to social justice.” Justice K Chandru, former Madras Judge of the High Court, said the governor could only return the bill on healthy legal reasons, and Not because of subjective satisfaction.
This decision to return the bill, a partner with a long delay, has made a decision clearly not constitutional, he said.
Chandru said the decision ignored the collective resolution of 230 MLA which supported the law.
Returns of bills for re-consideration is only open when the problem concerned has never been noticed by the house, not when he has argued and adopted, he added.