Chandigarh: The Punjab High Court and Haryana have argued that the turban is a “important religious symbol” and upload photos of parents in injured conditions without turban on social media, totaling violations of hurting religious sentiments.
“The complainant is 65 years old.
The Surban has taken off and he has been repeatedly beaten.
The applicant and other defendants have troubled them without turban when he bleed and the same thing has been uploaded on Facebook.
Sorban is an important religious symbol and photographed parents in a condition injured without a turban and uploading it to be seen publicly on the social platform will provide a facie to hurt religious feelings, “HC has been held.
Justice Anuplinder Singh Grewal from the High Court has passed this order while rejecting the Anticipatory PLEA bail submitted by Gurpreet Singh from the Tarn Taran District in Punjab.
Applicants have been seeking anticipatory assurance in connection with FIR No.10 on February 19, 2021, registered at the Taran District Jhabal District Police Station in Punjab under the IPC section.
The advice for the Petitioner argues that the part that is slapped in FIR is and the case below the 295-A section (hurt religious sentiment) will not be made because DSP has stated that the accusation of hurting the feeling of the complainant is not made.
It was also said that there was a one-year delay and five months in Registration FIR.
Very objected to a guarantee request, advice for the complainant thinks that previously he had submitted a petition before HC with the audio CD incident, to seek Registration FIR against the applicant.
The police registered Fir just after the petition.
The complainant also argued that he had previously made several representations and complaints to the police but there was no action taken on it.
The incident CD was also placed on the note before HC.
After hearing the two parties and considering “serious accusations” in this issue, Gregal Justice rejected an anticipatory assurance request, observed that the court disagreed with the conflict of advice for the Petitioner that the case of the prime facie under the part of the Indian Criminal Code (IPC) was not made .