New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday save its decision on the simultaneous decision from Kerala and HC judges rejected the public prosecutor to withdrawing cases in the prevention of the destruction of the left party law in the vandalism in the house during the 2015-16 budget presentation.
Judgment for this appeal, submitted by the Kerala Government, will have far implications for parliament and assemblies.
If the judicial bench D y Chandrachud and M R Shah enforce the HC verdict, it will have a deterrent effect that salute the behavior that is difficult to regulate by MPIREMENT and MLA members who pamper themselves in the destruction of furniture, revoking Mikes and throwing chairs in the house.
Appearing for Kerala government, senior advocate Ranjit Kumar said protests and curves were part of MLA’s right for freedom of speech and he could not be prosecuted in court for his actions.
The bench asked, “Is the vandalism and the destruction of public property included in freedom of speech? Is this interesting to the public to attract cases against MLA that spoil vandalism …?”
Protests and free speeches at home include Vandalism: SC
