New Delhi: emphasizes that people must be allowed to increase their voices in democracy, the Supreme Court on Tuesday objected to the central income that the court could not entertain the Pils submitted by several NGOs because they intended to run “parallel administration” by asking some petitions challenging government decisions.
While opposing pills submitted by Advocates Prashant Bhushan on behalf of the general cause, an NGO, against the central decision for retrospective changes in the term of office of Sanjay Kumar Mishra from two years and three years, asked a bench from Judge L Nageswara Rao and BR Gavai that the court must take A serious view of the recent trend of several organizations, including the applicant, misused the judiciary by submitting the government’s interest in government decisions.
“This causes legal process harassment by individuals and certain organizations that exist with the sole purpose, the purpose and purpose of submitting the PILS selectively.
Under the Jurisprudence scheme of India and even under the diluted concept of Locus Starti, it is unthinkable that one organization can only exist to submit Pils as the only function.
Pils archiving can never be a profession by itself, both for individuals or for any organization.
The fact of the selective archiving of the case by the organization defeats the most important object where this court is in their enthusiasm to relieve injustice where -Mana, has tightened the concept of stupi locus, “said Mehta.
The bench, however, is not convinced by submission and said the problems raised by NGOs must be decided on achievement.
“The public sound must be raised in democracy,” he said.