Pune, the additional session of the agrawal GP Judge here on Thursday was punished and sentenced by Swati Vikram Malvadkar (29) to serve a life sentence to poison her three-year-old son to death at his home in Rupeenagar on August 2, 2016.
The court also imposed three years and six months sentences in Swati to manage poisons and try suicide, under section 328 and 309 of the Indian criminal code.
The sentence must run along with the main sentence, the court said.
Swati, which was given a guarantee on September 24, 2016, was detained after a sentence and sent to prison.
Additional Public Prosecutor Leena Pathak to Tii, “The convict wants to live separately from his combined family, and this is the cause often fighting with her husband, Vikram, which he married on May 3, 2013.” The agrawal judge said that the minimum sentence for belief below Section 302 (murder) was a life span and because this case was not included in Ambit “the rarest of rare cases” to attract the death penalty, prisoners will suffer a lifelong imprisonment.
The judge stated the sadness of “the way in which a child was killed by his own birth giver.” On the day of the incident, Swati’s husband, who was working, called his brother Shrikant at around 1.45 a night and asked him to check why Swati did not respond to his call.
When Shrikant reached the house, he found both three-year-old children and Swati lay motionless.
Saree was found entangled with the bedroom ceiling fan.
Both were rushed to the nearest hospital where children were declared dead, and Swati was referred to for care.
A post-mortem is carried out in children and a chit, it is said that by Swati was found in the pocket of a child’s pants.
Police Nigdi registered FIR and the next investigation caused the capture of Swati on August 20, 2016.
The police also recovered two bottle of khatnil, insecticide, and Temprid SC, used to control bed bugs, from the place.
The defendant was then charged to violations below 302, 328 and 309 from the IPC.
During the trial, the defendant had taken the defense of fake implications when his father-inlaw was a former police officer.
He also referred to cases of domestic violence that had been registered with his husband and his in-laws.
However, the court found substances in the argument of prosecution that cases of domestic violence were registered after Swati consciously returned at the hospital, was a reflection.
In addition, the claim is not supported by the right evidence.
On the contrary, 13 witnesses examined by prosecution, besides evidence found reliable, unshakable and credible, said the court.