Beas (Amritsar) / Chandigarh: Sad on Wednesday claimed to have done an “attack” on the edge of the beat to expose the “biggest illegal mining” near Beas City.
It also filed a complaint against Congress leaders, accusing them involved in sand mining.
A few hours after the attack by workers and sad leaders, led by the President of the Sukhbir Singh Badal, the Mining Department here claimed that the site where Sukhbir was visited was a legal mining site.
A spokesman for the department criticized sadly to play politics with misinterpreting facts and issuing release that informed RS 34.4 Crore per year from the mining block number 5.
Department spokesman have the Directorate of Enforcement and also developed illegal portals to oversee each activity Illegal.
However, Sad claimed that when Cavalcade Sukhbir arrived near Beas, he found a large number of trucks, sticks of forks, pipelines, and some truck drivers also escaped from the site.
Speaking with the media, Sukhbir said illegal mining pose a big threat to the base bridge, which was the path of living in the Majha Punjab area.
He said when mining activities could erode the river and destroy the fields, he had filed a complaint against the Minister of Congress Sukhbinder Sarkaria and MLA, including Santokh Singh Bhalapur, Sukhpal Bhullar, Inderbir Bolalaria, Ramanjit Singh Sikki and Kingpins Mining Ashok Chandak, Rakesh Chaudhary and Mohan buddy Beas police station.
Accused that such activities were not limited to Beas, Sukhbir said it was surprising that instead of providing legal mining contracts and income revenues for the country, all operations had been submitted to the sand of cotton mining from Rajasthan and Jammu.
“This Kingpin has connected Congress Parliament, MLA and leaders with them and together looted state resources,” he said.
Sad will soon launch mass agitation of illegal mining and “will also approach the court, if needed, because the State Mining Department does not do his job by playing to the hand of the mining mafia,” he said.
Quoting the NGT guidelines that there were no mining activities that took place within 5 km of the bridge, Sukhbir said in this case, the sand was mined in a distance of one kilometer.
Likewise, he said, the de-sorting claim carried out on the site was wrong because it could not be done in running water, he said.