Bengaluru: Just poke fun without motives to hurt someone or make a lost comment that cannot be considered a stretch of imagination being interpreted as a cruel act, the High Court was observed while canceling the process that began with a dentist based in Los Angeles and his parents Gurugram.
Propidates started based on complaints submitted by the dentist’s wife with Ulsoor police in Bengaluru in 2017 and a FIR was registered for violations under 56 and 325 from IPC and 4 of the Dowry Law.
The couple had met in Bengaluru where the man did MDS in a private college; The woman worked in a private company and both fell in love.
The complainant accused her husband did not treat it after their marriage in 2012 and made a comment that was not sensitive when he fell ill, implying that children born for him would become more painful.
He even alleged that her husband had a relationship with another doctor.
However, it appears for the Petitioners, Advocate Prabhjit Jauhar shows that each marriage passes the wear period and at reading complaints, it seems that the complaint is nothing but an effort to explode from the usual proportion of arguments and disagreements between couples through rough patches.
Make notes, Justice G Narendar notes that other than the selfish statement, there is absolutely no material placed by the complainant to show such a prohibited relationship.
“The fact that the complainant (wife) is sponsored by the dependent visa will only go to show that the third applicant (husband) voluntarily offered to support him as long as he lived in the US.
The Dependent Visa was given by the destination country only when sponsors had enough facilities to support him And the dependents and also have permission to remain in the country.
The fact that he was allowed into the US in a visa dependent enough to dispose of his accusation, “Justice G Narendar observed in his demands.
The judge showed that in one breath, the complainant stated how he begged and pleaded with his in-laws to allow him to stay at his home words and again claimed, “I was too scared and hesitant even to stay in their home”.
The judge added that the case in hand falls in extraordinary cases carved by the Supreme Court in the state of Haryana and others vs.
Bhajan Lal and others, who demanded strength training attached to the part 482 CRPC.