Mumbai: Congress Party leader Rahul Gandhi has transferred a recent Court recently to cancel the order of Judge Mumbai in complaints with defamation of his conjecture about Prime Minister Narendra Modi on public rallies on September 20, 2018 in Rajasthan.
Gandhi seeks to stop complaints of defamation and as a temporary savings in the process of him saying, “There is absolutely no truth with complaints and for standing as a member of the chosen parliament, he is exposed to reckless and annoying litigation by him.
Political enemy.” His petition Said, “Instant complaints are a classic example of reckless and annoying litigation, motivated by the only purpose of advancing a person’s latent political agenda.” Gandhi, 51, MP Member (MP) from Wayanad, Kerala, in his request made the state of Maharashtra and Mahesh Shrishrimal, 46, a politician in Mumbai, responded to those who responded and requested the order of calls on August 28, 2019 issued for him by him Gigaum Metropolitan Judge in Mumbai.
Gandhi’s advocate, Kushal Mor appeared in front of the judicial bench S K Shinde on Wednesday when the problem was called.
HC posted it to hear on November 22, at his request.
His request was that the order below the challenge was in personal complaints on November 1, 2018 by Shrishrimal who was said to be members of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
It was said that on July 21, Gandhi received a call on July 12 issued by Judge Gigaum to appear before the court on July 30.
He obeyed, by appearing on July 26 through his bridge.
The petition said that regardless of the 2019 call, he did not accept each other until one on July 202 and hence “did not realize the ‘complaint submitted against him.
One reason in his clattering petition is that,” If the speech is political, where the subject matter is a question In the public domain and imagine a raging political debate and there is an opinion on both sides, the same thing will not be borne in parts 499/500 IPC (Criminal Code of India) (criminal violations of defamation) and drugs to take advantage of exception benefits such as those Given in this section must be available for accused at any stage.
“