Nagpur: The historical place of the popular Ramtek Gadh temple housing has two older old-fashioned temples than the main and is said to be built between 420 and 450 AD.
These temples are named Varaah and Trivyrama.
This disclosure was made by Amicus Curiae Anand Jaiswal in his written statement to the Nagpur bench Bombay High Court where he stated that this was the structure of the Vakataca era built by Prabhavati Gupta, Princess Emperor Chandragupta from the Gupta Dynasty, who married Rudra Sena, who married Rudra Sena, who married Rudra Sena, who married Rudra Sena, who married Rudra Sena, who was married to Rudra Sena, who was married to Rudra Sena, who was married to Rudra Sena, who married Rudra Sena, who married Rudra Sena, Ruler of Vakataka in this region.
After his previous visit to the place, he had told about two more ancient Narsimha temples at the foot of Rudra Narsimha and Keval from the same era.
“These temples are much older than Ramtek Gadh Mandir.
Unfortunately, these temples, their mercy, their historical interests and their scarcity (becoming a Vaishnav Temple built by the Vakaaki Dynasty Dominated by Shaivite) is not enough to be published and the people at Nagpur and the nearest area said, “said senior adviser, while citing inscriptions on the structure.
According to Jaiswal, these temples are truly hidden from previous general views, but recently, the authorities have built a way of approach.
“Unless the public is aware of the historicity of these temples by placing large boards that provide information, no one knows that they are there and there will be no appeal to people to travel.
Therefore it is recommended that a signage is Large enough will be installed at the beginning of the road and near the parking lot of the existence, history and uniqueness of this structure so that the worshipers can know about the uniqueness of this historic structure, “Jaiswal said.
He showed that the roof of this temple has developed cracks which has been fulfilled while cement and requires restoration soon.
“It is also noted that the interior of these temples in the dark.
It is necessary to make arrangements for a kind of light, natural or artificial, to highlight their uniqueness.
There is a need to protect inscriptions on the structure,” he said.
It is necessary to remove encroachment to immediately notify HC or the previous order to remove all encroachment from the temple place, Amicus Curiae has shown that the shop owner has illegally occupied the area.
“It is necessary to remove this illegal work which reduces the beauty of this stone structure.
At the same time, this shop owner must be given an alternative, so that their livelihood is not affected.
This can be done by providing shops at the bottom of the stairs along the way of approaching to Temple.
This will ensure that the beauty of the Temple is restored and the shopkeeper’s livelihood is also protected, “Jaiswal said, he suggested that the right room be identified and restricted and the shops are regulated accordingly.