Chandigarh: Paving the way for the announcement that is widely awaited in the former manager of Dera Sacha Sauda Ranjit Singh Murder where the head of the Gurmet Ram Ram Ram is one of the main charges, the Punjab High Court and Haryana on Tuesday rejected the transfer of cases to other judges.
With this, the verdict in the case of the ranjit singh murder test will be spoken by a special CBI judge, Panchkula, Sushil Kumar Garg.
Until now, there lived on the order statement.
“The Petitioner’s concern cannot be considered reasonable; this is imaginary and based on fire and alleged.
The trial is at the stage of pronunciation Can be allowed to have a chosen bench or to get the results of the trial as he wishes, “Justice Avneesh Jhingan was held when he rejected the petition submitted by Ranjit Singh’s son, Jagseer looked for instructions for the transfer of cases from Judge Sushil Kumar Garg to several other CBI judges in Haryana , Punjab or Chandigarh.
‘Case sensitivity cannot be the basis for the transfer of experiments’ with the advancement of technology and social media activism, the accusation leveled by such persecutors needs to be examined very carefully.
When asking about worried redirects, the transfer of trials at the end of the FAG will produce browbeating judges and interference in fair administration of justice, “observes justice jhingan.
The judge also believes that the effort to argue that the trial in the current case is a different nature given its sensitivity and The involvement of high profile defendants cannot form the basis for the transfer of trials.
At the satisfaction of the applicant regarding the presence of the CBI Public Prosecutor KP Singh at the Sushil Kumar Garg CBI Judge Court during the trial, HC has relied on satisfaction delivered by Sumeet Goel, Advisor Senior representing the CBI that KP Singh is a regular public prosecutor at the CBI Court in Panchkula.
Goel also argues that senior public prosecutors and special public prosecutors have been specifically appointed to represent the CBI in this case.
Being a public prosecutor appointed in court , the presence Its (KP Singh) clear and regular in court, he can help his colleagues, HC has been held.
In his request before HC, Almare’s son had alleged that he had a reasonable concern that the judge was too influenced by the defendant through respondents No.
2 (CBI Public Prosecutor KP Singh), who is the CBI prosecutor in other cases but not in this matter but he took an impossible interest and used an undue influence on special CBI judges, Panchkula.
Senior Advocate Bains RS, while appearing for the Petitioner argue that the worries of the applicant about this case did not get a fair trial based on various examples, some of them were not directly related to the trial in this case.
Bains relied on complaints made against special judges Sushil Kumar Garg in another case to file that his behavior was not on board.
Interestingly, Senior Advocate Vinod Ghai and Ahuja Kanika Advocate, while representing the Head of Dera and the other defendants have opposed the petition, which attracts that the applicant has flattened charges of justice.
It was also handed over by the advice that such accusations were embarrassing and if they failed to prove it, they had to be detained because of insult.