New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday refused to disturb the order while Delhi High Court at the door-to-door food grain by the Delhi government.
Delhi HC on September 27 was cleaned on the road to the implementation of the shipment of the Ransum scheme threshold, where the center moved the Supreme Court.
The Delhi government assured the Supreme Court that it would not apply the sending door to the door to the door to Delhi HC taking the main petition that was delayed there to the validity of the scheme on November 22.
The Delhi government also mentioned the record of the scheme “was fully compatible with one state (onorc)” Onorc).
The bench headed by Justice L.
Nageswara Rao and consisted of justice Br Gavai questioned senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who represented the Delhi government: “Have you started to apply the scheme (sending door backpack)?” Singhvi proposed that 90 percent of residents had submitted this scheme – 69 lakh people from 72 lakh were registered.
Singhvi added that today Amazon made home delivery, food was delivered at home, and also liquor, therefore there was nothing wrong in sending grains at the door of the poor under the public distribution system (PDS).
He added that there was a lobby, who did not want the Delhi government to fill leaks in the system.
Bench asked, “Did the Delhi government apply this scheme?” Singhvi answered, “It doesn’t start in a full swing, preparation is going on”.
The bench pose a second query, does it take care of the Onorc scheme? Singhvi answered the Delhi government was proud to make the scheme completely free of corruption, because everything was computerized, and biometric was there.
“Fully compatible with the Onorc scheme”, send Singhvi.
After hearing the argument in this matter, the bench was originally recorded in the order that the Delhi government could not apply the scheme to the disposal of the problem by the High Court.
However, Singhvi stressed that this would be a long time in the scheme and insisted that the government would not apply it until November 22.
Singhvi asked the bench to record in the order of submission that there was no possibility of implementation in a week.
“These words might spread that there are complete fixed in the scheme”, said Singhvi.
The bench said he would check Singhvi’s submission, when the final order passed.
The bench also said it was not inclined to entertain the special leave petition submitted by the center and Delhi Sarkari Sangh ration dealer on the HC command passed on September 27, 2021.
The top court also asked the parties not to delay in this problem, when it appeared to hear in HC .
The center, in its request, has told the best trial that the door to the door to the Door of the Delhi government will create a “opaque”, which will risk many beneficiaries, especially migrant workers, which are covered under national food.
Security Law (NFSA) in the national capital.
This center argues that the door to door ration scheme not only has a “material deficiency” but also in contradictions with NFSA, 2013, and may also have adverse implications in the implementation of the Onorc scheme.
Ransum Door-to-Door: SC refused to interfere with HC orders
