New Delhi: warn the world about the dangers of religious phobia, India re-raised the problem of ‘Hinduphobia’, and also anti-Sikh and anti-Buddhist phobia, called for the United Nations to overcome this threat to ensure “greater balance” into discussions about these topics .
Indian permanent representatives for the United Nations, Tiruahu said on Thursday that the United Nations highlighted the forms of other religious phobias, it had not fully recognized the anti-Hindu threat, anti-Sikh and anti-Semitism.
He also slammed the step by several member countries to categorize terrorism, based on the motivation behind the action, by saying that it damaged the universally accepted principles that terrorism in all forms and manifestations must be condemned.
Junior Foreign Minister V Muraleedharan, while talking to UNSC last year, has increased the same problem as saying anti-Hindu phobia is among the forms of more malignant religious phobia which failed to be recognized by the world.
“Another prominent trend highlights certain religious phobias.
The United Nations has highlighted some of them for years, namely, those based on Islamophobia, Christianophobia and anti-Semitism – Three religions Abrundi.
The third found this mentions in global counter-terrorism strategies , “said Tiringu.
“But new phobias, hatred or bias towards other major religions in the world also need to be fully recognized.
The emergence of contemporary religiophobia forms, especially anti-Hinduism, anti-Buddhism and anti-Sikh phobia is a matter of serious concern and requires the attention of the United Nations and All of its member countries to overcome this threat, “he added.
He refers to the global strategy of Global Global UN global last year which refers to Islamophobia, Christianophobia and anti-Semitism but not what has worked for highlight.
on Thursday.
He clarified that he spoke as an Indian Ambassador to the United Nations and not as chairman of the United Nations counter-terrorism committee.
Tirumu also slammed the move to categorize terrorism, and extremism of conducive violence for terrorism, based on the motivation behind the action.
Without naming any country, he said that in the past two years, several member countries, driven by political motivation, religion and others, have tried to label terrorism into categories such as “violent extremism motivating racial and ethnic …”