New Delhi: In a big assistance for the president of the Punjab Congress Navjot Singh Sidhu ahead of the election of the Assembly, the Supreme Court on Wednesday postponed the trial of the petition that was seeking his punishment to him in the case of attack.
SC in 2018 has released Sidhu with a fine of only Rs 1,000 in a case related to attacking one Gurnam Singh, after the victim had died.
At the request of his advice p Chidambaram, SC posted the trial on February 25, five days after the vote in Punjab.
Meanwhile, Sidhu’s efforts to blame the SC registry for the “unexpected list of review petitions” backfired as judge a M Khanwilkar and Sanjay K Kaul said this problem was notified much earlier.
Notification of the petition of the reviews was issued in September 2018 but the defendant did not submit a reward until now.
The petition requested a review of the SC-2018 decision to disappoint cricket-turned politicians with a fine of Rs 1,000 by modifying the Punjab High Court order and Haryana punished him because of the guilty killings who did not amount to the murder and gave three years of snacks.
Sidhu, along with Rupin Co-accused Singh Sandhu, was tried for the charges below Section 302 and 323 (voluntarily caused injury) reading with part 34 (general intentions) from Kuhi Palan India but was released by the Patiala Court on September 22, 1999., because Allegedly punching Gurnam who died in the hospital.
Punjab has appealed the release in HC, which in December 2006 punished him and Sandhu under Section 304-II (guilty murder did not amount to murder) and punished them up to three years in prison, besides a fine of each RS 1 Lakh.
Sidhu, who has resigned as a member of parliament after the HC decision, moved SC which was seeking suspension of belief and punishment to allow him to contest as a BJP candidate.
SC bench, which was headed by Justice G P Mathur on January 23, 2007, suspended confidence and punishment.
SC order remains valid for more than 11 years and on May 15, 2018, another bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar wrote the final judgment about Sidhu’s appeal, said he was most responsible for being punished under the 323 part of the IPC, which gave a one-year imprisonment sentence fine RS 1,000.
Judge Chelameswar said because it was a 30-year-old violation, Sidhu could be released with a fine of Rs 1,000.
Gurnam Jaswinder Singh’s friend, who was also injured in the alleged attack by Sindhu and Sandhu, submitted a request to review the 2018 decision, which was taken in the Open Court on Thursday by the judicial bench A M Khanwilkar and Sanjay K veins.
The review petition said, “It will be a great parody of justice if Sidhu is released with a punishment of coercion of RS 1,000 fines below the 323 part of the IPC despite being taken into account directly from the injury caused by it.
The attack and injury clearly show (sic) who accused Sidhu know that The same thing tends to cause the death of the deceased Gurnam Singh to whom the danger is caused Medical on the doctor instead states that death is the result of ‘effects of head injury and heart condition’ and the same clearly stipulates that the head injury itself is enough to cause death in ordinary nature.
There is no medical opinion, report or evidence, has been stated that Gurnam Singh’s death was taken into account in Jan’s condition Tungnya.
Therefore, there is no basis for SC to come to the conclusion that Gurnam Singh suffered a heart attack which resulted in his death, “Review Applicant.
Said.