Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday was asked to submit a short Affidavit on why temporary help should not be given, on Thursday, in two pills that said that the rule would have a cold effect on a free speech.
The additional lawyer General Anil Singh for the center informs the HC bench from the chairman of Judge Datta and Justice Gires Kulkarni that his transfer petition is not registered before the Supreme Court and the government mentioned and has been looking for the initial date.
The center said 14 such challenges had been submitted in various high courts, and had been sought that all things were heard together before SC.
He cited the command HC Madras who had just issued a notice but did not pass the temporary commandment to keep new rules.
HC which is recommended verbally if the stay is given in pill and finally fails, the applicant cannot request protection for anything written or published in an interregnum that might violate reasonable restrictions, but the sword will depend on their heads at the time.
“Can we think of a solution that can be applied meanwhile,” asked.
For the query, Singh said the reply before other HCS was in preparation and the possibility would be immediately submitted.
He looked for time until Monday to submit a reply, but it was suggested that a brief written statement was submitted to deal with the application.
Reply until tomorrow why relief is temporarily not given to the rules: HC
