New Delhi: The Tripura Government has told the Supreme Court that citizens “Public Spirit” who are looking for independent investigations into “communal riots” recently in this country have come with “unclean hands” and it is under Garb Public Interest, Forum This court is used for “tilting” purposes.
Pointing to the “silence” of the Petitioner in a series of pre-poll violence and after the polls that took place in West Bengal, the Tripura government said what was called the public spirit of the applicant did not move a few months back on a greater scale of communal violence and suddenly sprit Their public is aroused because some examples are small like Tripura.
“It is necessary that the selective anger of the applicant is not presented before this court as a defense but to satisfy this court under Garb public interest, August forum in this court is used for tilt purposes,” an affidavit submitted by the state government.
“This is not a question about one petition or the other but the majesty and chastity of the trial before the highest court of the state.
There are no individuals or individual groups that function professionally because people / groups are vibrant to be selectively requested the tremendous jurisdiction of the court to achieve clear motives But it was not kept secret.
The selective rousing of the public interest itself confirmed the dismissal of the petition with exemplary fees, “said information.
Affidavit was submitted in response to pills submitted by Advocates Ethesham Hashmi looking for an independent investigation into “communal riots” recently in Tripura and the alleged involvement and the absence of the state police in it.
The Tripura government further said that the petition was based on the basis of the “private / sponsor” ‘reports’ titled “Humanity was attacked in Tripura #Muslim Life Material” and could not be maintained.
“Sincere and bonafide citizens will not be selective in their public interests and will not choose to rush before the court related to one country and remain silent in connection with the others,” Tripura said.
The current case is clearly a case of selective anger in the pretense of public interest and to achieve some of the agenda that is kept secret, allegedly.
The last northeastern state witnessed the incidence of combustion, looting and violence after the report emerged from Bangladesh that the Hindu minority there had been attacked during Durga Puja about allegations of blasphemy.
The request by Hashmi has accused the police authority hand in hand with perpetrators and not a single arrest made in connection with rioters, responsible for vandalism and combustion.
It was said that the police and authority of the country instead of trying to stop violence continued to claim that there was no communal tension anywhere in Tripura and reporting the reports of the burned religion.
On November 11, the upper court heard the request of two advocates and a journalist who was seeking arrangement of criminal cases that nested under the provisions of strong UPA against them for allegedly presenting facts through social media posts in Tripura.
This member of the civil society, which is part of the facts finding committee, also challenges the constitutional validity of several provisions (prevention) that violates the law (prevention) of the law, 1967 on the grounds that the definition of activities that violate the law is unclear and more widely and especially again.
, the law makes guarantees accusing very difficult.