New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday withdrew the Gujarat government because it did not challenge the guarantee given to a defendant who had defeated Dalit to death in 2018 in Rajkot Regency, saying it failed to protect the rights of the victim and set aside a two and a half years high court order Guarantee given.
Holding that guarantee given by the High Court in the “most origin and relaxed way”, judge, Mr.
Shah and BV Nagaratha said that the state must be serious in such cases and should soon challenge the high court order.
It rejects the submission of the state which argues that “it takes time to make a decision whether it prefers appeal or not” and argues that the country fails in its duties to protect the victims.
The court issued an order to the appeal submitted by a wife who died 35 years old.
“We can observe that by not appealing by the state on the assessment and commands that are revealed that release accusations of guarantees in such serious things, the state has failed to protect the rights of the victim.
We argue that this is a case of suitability where the state should prefer to appeal who challenged the commands passed by the High Court that released allegations of collateral.
In criminal things, those who were treated as those who were harmed were community social interests in general and therefore for the state to take all the steps needed to bring people who have acted on interests Social society to order, “Bench said.
In this case the deceased was tied to the factory gate as he collected memos and was beaten mercilessly.
All events, which took place near the Shapar City of Rajkot District, were caught on CCTV and also recorded on the cellphone.
The Apex Court said that HC issued a guarantee order without considering the seriousness of violations and noted that HC was mistaken in the passing sequence and noted that the pipeline and belt used in the recovered crime commission and video recordings clearly showed that the deceased was brutally beaten by the defendant.
“It is enough to say that in terms of serious and seeing gravity violations and remembering eyewitness statements and that all incidents have been recorded in CCTV recordings and cellphones, the High Court has conducted a grave of errors in releasing respondents each 1 – accused of guarantee.
Judgment and commands passed by the High Court who released allegations in unsustainable guarantees both, in the facts and the law “Submission by Aastha Mehta Counsel appears on behalf of the state needed time to make a decision whether it prefers an appeal or unacceptable.
The state should be very serious even to maintain legal rules in serious things like this where someone was killed / killed brutally when he only collected memos outside the factory with his wife and aunt.
This is the duty of the director of prosecution and the state to ensure that the guilty is ordered and punished, “he said.
The court directed the accusers to surrender in a week and said,” We hope and believe in the future of the state government / legal department of the state government and director of prosecution will Take a quick decision in things like this and challenge orders authorized by the court of trial and / or the High Court because the case can be found in guarantees in serious violations such as today “.