New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday confirmed the protection of omnibus from the arrest of arrest in Nandigram constituency during assembly selection.
One case related to the revival of closed investigations into the alleged death of Adhikari’s surgery, which took place in 2018 when he was still in TMC.
Another case relating to the alleged strengthening of a pedestrian near the roadside restaurant of Rs 5,000 and a gold chain.
Appeared for Adhikari, a senior advocate of Harish Salve and PS Patwalia, said the trend in the lodging case after he defeated Banerjee was only a “revenge regime”.
Appearing for the West West Government, senior advocate Kalyan Banerjee said in 41 years of legal practice, he had never found the order of omnibus from HC to hold the police to carry out his legal duties to investigate complaints.
“Can the blanket protection command be given to people accused so much that even in the case of complaints in the future about criminal acts, the police must take permission from HC to arrest the person accused of? Allow police to continue investigations , which recently emerged for the BJP MP President and the Sukanta Party Majumdar to seek hearing urged his request for the spread of paramilitary forces to stop the TMC leadership in threatening BJP candidates to withdraw from Kolkata’s city selection, plus Banerjee’s argument and said it was outside jurisdiction HC to launch a mobile investigation and still investigate.
After hearing both parties patiently for more than half an hour, Judge Dy Chandrachud and when Bopanna blamed the West Bengal government because they did not submit Affidavit response to the Adhikari petition in HC and to rush to the APEX court to the temporary order of protection from BJPLADER.
“We don’t tend to train our extraordinary jurisdiction to entertain the appeal against the temporary order of HC,” Bench said.
Referring to the temporary order of September 6 from HC, Bench said, “The single Judge has allowed information from the opposition to be submitted within four weeks and the answer, if any, was submitted in two weeks afterwards.
Until now, West Bengal State And the investigation officer has not yet submitted their reply.
Prima Facie’s observations about HCAT this stage supports AD-interim’s stay period.
Constitution.
“” We, however, let it open to the applicants to submit written information – contradict before HC.
After that, HC can consider taking a petition for a fast-end disposal or, if it is impossible to do so, to consider whatever application can submitted for temporary order modification based b Radan produced by investigative officers in the Affidavit-in-Opposition.
This court has not stated the last opinion about the benefits of the problem that will rise in the letter petition pending before HC, “he said.
The widow of the deceased guards, through Anand Grover, told the court that there was no investigation into the death when Adhikari was later in the powerful dispensation.
Now , the police wanted to investigate, HC had lived, “he said.
But, SC asked why he was silent from 2018 to 2021 for three years and notified the widow to make it an application before HC became a party in a delayed process.