Panaji: In a large setback to the State Government, who tried to restart mining activities in Goa, the Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the petition of the reviews submitted by the state government whoe seek operations 88 mining rented canceled in 2018 was canceled in 2018 with the basis of delay In submitting a petition for more than 20 months, and said that the application did not have advantages.
SC rejected the government’s request because it was submitted after 650 days when it had to be submitted within 30 days.
In the same place, the court did not consider the request for mining companies as submitted after two years.
Mining in Goa stopped in March 2018 After the decision of PEX Court to cancel the second update of mining rent 88.
The Apex Court noted that the four petitions preferred by the state have delays 650 to 651 days and four requests submitted by Vedanta Limited (formerly known as SESA Sterlite Limited) has a delay of 907 days.
The top court also observed that “the application to review the assessment must be submitted within thirty days from the date of assessment or order sought to be reviewed”.
The division bench consisting of judges D y Chandrachud and Mr.
Shah observed, “There is no land equipped with delays between 20 and 26 months by both parties in submitting their application to be reviewed.
The judges consisting of two judges at the Goa Foundation II , Judge M and Deepak Gupta, each retired from this court on December 30, 2018 and May 6, 2020, respectively “.
SC observed that the state of the Goa submitted its review petition in November 2019, after Pension Labor, and Vedanta submitted a petition in August 2020, after retiring Gupta.
“Such practices must be very not approved (from) to preserve the institutional sanctity of this court decision making.
The Applicant review is aware of this court’s decision,” the bench was held.
“Given the above, we tend to stop the petition this review on the grounds limitation.
However, in any case, we also found that there was no legitimate reason for assessment assessment at Goa Foundation II had been made, and dismissing this petition on the reward Also, “Bench said.