New Delhi: In special investigative activities that have been unprecedented, a special investigation team that has never had previously ordered 28 advocates to apply for fake motorcycle claims.
Claim of petition before the court left Supreme Scandiing with the income on the board part of the bar up and called for the Indian Bar Board to take appropriate action.
Understanding the tendency of the bench consisting of Judge Mr.
Shah and Sanjiv Khanna and bound by the promise made by Adviser BCI Ardhendumauli Prasad that the Apex Supervisory Agency will take appropriate action, BCI led by senior advocate Manan Kumar Mishra has suspended 28 advocates.
‘The right to practice.
Lucknow bench from Allahabad High curud is a seat to investigate 233 suspicious claims cases before various motorbike accidents claimed the court.
Sit had submitted a status report on 92 criminal cases registered in various districts to date, where 28 advocates were crowned as people accused of 55 cases.
Investigation has been concluded / completed in 32 cases and the change sheets have been submitted.
Of the 28, as many as eight of the Saharapur, four of the Meerut, three of each of the Etawa and Aligarh, two of each of the Lucknow, Rae Bare, Ghazafarad and Muzaffarnager.
BCI on Monday said, “Board, after a comprehensive discussion and deliberation, has decided to put 28 advocates under the suspension whose names are listed in the first sheet / fee, until the process of them is complete.
BCI also directs the country’s board to start the disciplinary process Against this advocate and concluded an investigation within a period of three months and submit a report to BCI.
“SC bench led by Justice Shah had noticed this irregularity in October and looked for the upper bar council response.
However, the State Council has repeatedly failed to respond and represented in front of the APEX court.
The bench on November 16 said, “We observed that it was very unfortunate that in a serious problem, where the accusation was submitted a false claims application where the supporters were also allegedly involved, the top bar board did not give instructions to their advocates and it showed dissatisfaction and inequality in the part of the top bar board “.
Then BCI asked to see this problem.
It is said, “archiving of false claims petitions is a very serious problem.
In the end it affects the credibility of the institution as a whole.
The legal profession is always considered a very noble profession and things such as applying for false claims in court.
It is not tolerable.
Is the duty of the board bar Indian Countries and Councils of India to maintain dignity and restore the glory of the legal profession.
“Sit was formed by Bench Lucknow HC Allahabad to investigate 233 suspicious claims that had been dismissed, dismissed or for non-appearance of advocates by a court involving the number of claims more than RS 300 Crore.
“It is very unfortunate that despite the fact that the firs has been submitted as far as 2016-2017, there are still investigations reportedly delayed.
Even in cases where the cost sheet has been submitted, there are no framed costs below,” Bench said.
“Seated was formed by HC to look into the filing of false claims requests and with a specific purpose.
Still investigations in most cases / fir reportedly delayed.
We delay negligence and or lethargy.
Sitting in not concluding the investigation even after 4-5 years and FIR , “he said.
SC frowned on advocate behavior and asked BCI to take action
