New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday expressed concern for the quality of deteriorating legal education in the country and emphasizing quality checks must limit people’s entries in the profession.
The court of hearing the request by the Indian Bar Board (BCI) challenged the Gujarat High Court Assessment, which allowed people with other jobs, both full-time or part-time, to register as an advocate without leaving their work without leaving their work without leaving their work without leaving work They without leaving their work without leaving their work without leaving their work without leaving their work without leaving their work.
Safe! You have managed to throw your voteogin to see the bench result consisting of Judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul and M.M.
Sundresh observes that the system can be increased at the level of the entry and is the responsibility of BCI to conduct the right test.
This emphasizes strict examination of law schools and that at the beginner level, more serious criteria are important.
Advice, appearing as Amicus Curiae in this problem, suggests working on a mechanism, where people who come from jobs are not registered and remember the certificate at first, but placing registers fulfilling their requirements to write checks and based on the results, registration will follow.
Advice added that the person can be allowed to register with the bar, after they meet the written examination terms followed by a strict viva.
The bench noted that it might not deserve to allow registration while someone is still holding on to their existing work.
Furthermore, it shows that when a professional register with the bar leaves a legal profession, they do not submit their registration certificate, which is something that must be set BCI.
Senior advocate..
Bhat represents BCI before the bench.
The top yesterday told BCI advisers that the exam must test knowledge and show there is sufficient example where people get a legal degree without attending classes and quoted examples where legal courses take place in Cowsheds.
Further emphasizes that it is very important to establish more serious criteria to enter the legal profession.
The bench said: “This really dilutes quality …
People without attending classes get a legal degree.”
Bench told BCI advisers to control entries to determine quality, because the quality cannot be ascertained by taking a lot.
After a detailed hearing in this matter, the bench scheduled this problem to hear further on February 22.
SC is concerned about the deteriorating quality of legal education in the country
