New Delhi: The Supreme Court has a Prima Facie holding a former Secretary of the Head of Bihar Tripurari Sharan and other serving officials, including the Secretary of the Finance Secretary, guilty of the insults of the court and asked them to personally appear in front of him to explain why they did not become convicted for not obeying his orders for provide retirees and retirees to several state government employees.
Judge L Nageswara Rao and B R Gavi said that the non-compliance of the direction of Apex Court “was intentional and intentional and amounted to humiliation of this court”.
This case is related to the claim of the state government employees who are asked to join the Treasury Department of various companies after the fraud of animal feed but their term of office in the company is not considered by the state for retirees and retirees.
Employees who were harmed after it approached the APEX court through their lawyer Somesh Chandra Jha and the court passed the order for their help.
The instructions were issued in March 2020 and in February 2021, but the state was allegedly failed to obey orders in the past two years, forcing employees to submit an insulting petition on the top of the state government, including the later Tripurari Principal.
Sharan.
Advocate Somesh Chandra Jha believes that the behavior of the officials concerned insulting and praying for the right sentence for them for violating orders passed by the court.
“It will be related to showing that most applicants become senior citizens who really need medical attention and because their non-payment pensions cannot be treated alone.
The state government has failed in his role.
A model employer and only harasses applicants for where they must be burdened with The cost of weight and further can be directed to pay the appropriate interest rate for delayed payments, “he argued.
Approve with his request, the court agreed to begin the insulting process of them.
“In that view, we, Prima Facie, found that the non-compliance of the direction issued by this court on March 4, 2020 and February 15, 2021, was intentional and intentional and amounted to the insult to this court …
Therefore directed the respondent’s convention to keep present before the court It was on February 22 and showed the reason why they were innocent because they had committed an insult to this court and were punished according to the law, “Bench said.
Instructions that the court can take a soft view if the direction is fulfilled, Bench said, “There is no need to declare compliance with directions, meanwhile, will have an influence on the punishment that can be caused by the respondents”.