New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday highlighted Malady who had rooted in the police administration throughout the country, resulting in certain officers condemning pleasure with proactively regulating dispensation registration cases of thin or reckless cases of other police, only to be targeted by other police officers Leaning similar after the government changes.
“It is a disturbing feature throughout the country.
To be in books both in power, they do nutrients.
First, they actively register cases against their political opponents at the top of music.
They face music on Other police officers when the politicians were previously targeted in power, “said the Chairman of the Chief Judge NV Ramana and Justice Surya Kant.
“This is a clear system of system Singh alleged that he was politically victimized because he did not register a case against the former CM Raman Singh in suspicion of a scam in the vaginal nagrik aperti.
The attack by the wing of economic violations in 2015 raised a diary allegedly mentioning payment for “CM Master” and “CM Madam”.
On February 12, 2015, Singh’s predecessors carried out raids in various locations and Nigam Aaapurti Nagam headquarters and FIR registered at the Police Station (ACB / EOW), Raipur.
In the attack, two diaries were confiscated where the alleged gratuities paid to various state functionaries, have been mentioned and the diary contains “CM Most” and “CM Madam” entries, which later became the center of political controversy, he said.
Singh’s advice, senior advocate Fali Nariman, told the bench that “he became a victim because he did not carry out middle night cm instruction to register former CM cases”.
This was denied by the state government which, through senior advocate to beat Rohatgi and Rakesh Dwivedi, said there were two FIR who were registered against Singh, one below the 124A section (incitement) to try to disrupt the selected government led by Baghel and others to gather wealth Allegedly nine times a known source of income.
Appearing to Singh in the case of disproportionate assets, Senior Advocate Vikas Singh said police officers had explained every property and himself demanded the CBI investigation for an independent investigation into the charges against him.
Both Nariman and Singh request protection from arrest.
Rohatgi and Dwivedi said as the top police officer, Singh should give up instead of escaping and working with an ongoing investigation.
“Chargesheet in the case of incitement has been submitted and this petition seeks to stop for FIR has become an infructugia.
Moreover, police officers who fled no need for protection from the arrest,” Rohatgi said.
Dwivedi said the Income Tax Department and the CBI opposed police officers because there were cases of non-proportional assets that were disproportionate to it.
However, the Cji Ramana bench and Kant’s justice searched the Chhattisgarh government response within four weeks in two SLPS submitted by police officers and protected him from the arrest to the next hearing date.
In its order, the SC said, “Meanwhile, the country is directed not to capture the applicant in these matters (incolition cases and disproportional asset cases) to further orders.
The applicant is directed to participate in investigations / investigations and fully cooperate with The investigation body without failing.
“
SC: Netas police until Netas, filed a thin demand for the opposition
