New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday searched for responses from Chandigarh administration and Odisha government and J & K about the pair of Odia who asked for the saving of their pharmacist from ‘Cinta Jihad’, a term entering the history of SC through Hadiya -Safin Jahan Case from Kerala in 2017-18.
Judge Law Judges, Ajay Rastogi and Aniruddha Bose issued a notification to the government in a case that stretched three state and UT jurisdictions after hearing the argument from Sudarsh Menon, who told the story of a woman who could not track it after marriage for a Muslim man in Chandigarh , He said he disappeared into the interior of Chandigarh.
SC asked respondents to submit a counter-cons relationship on July 23, the next hearing date.
Parents – Kabita and Kedarnath – Moving Corpus Habeas petitions in SC capture threats to their daughter’s life.
The girl studied B Pinta with a man from J & K in Odisha before moving to Lucknow and then to Chandigarh in chasing work and then married and finally disappeared to J & K’s bandipora, who belonged to the man.
Parents say they are not against interfaith marriage, inter-caste or inter-religion and states that they will not endanger their daughter if he marryes a Hindu, Christian or Muslim son of his own choice.
They said they understood that their daughter had been forced to get married.
They said they knew that he was a human to who their daughter was married involved in the syndicate of crime that “played with the lives of Hindu girls.” Parents say they went to Chandigarh and tried to bring their daughter with them but their efforts failed.
“Our Muslim and daughter men moved Punjab and Haryana HC for protection.
The petition was then pulled and the couple disappeared,” they accused.
“We cannot contact him and are afraid that the syndicate of crime can force him to take illegal actions or act harm in national security.
His cellphone is turned off and we do not know his whereabouts,” they said.
SC Notification to Odisha, J & K & Chandigarh in the case of ‘Love Jihad’
