New Delhi: Dwarka Expressway Flyover Construction in the Dwarka Sector 22-23.
Has been coming under a Judicial Scanner with the Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear the Association of the Plea Resident accused the authority of the highway was “illegally” to build a flyover on the road without obtaining a required permit permission.
Judge Dy Chandrachud and Mr.
Shah pelved earlier hearing and registered it on Friday after advocating Anand Varma, who filed a petition on behalf of two housing community groups, alleged that full construction of the environment would occur if he did not stay.
The court after that issued a notification to the National Highway Authority (NHAI) who was looking for his response.
Advocate Prashant Bhushan, emerged for the applicants, said Nhai was building a small road that had been built through a solid-populated colony and had six schools on the edges.
He argued that NHAI did not hold public consultations, it did not get permission and environmental trees that were cut even after permission was given to do so.
“It should be noted that both NH-248BB and NH-344M there are highways which are then declared as a national highway under section 2 (2) of NH Act 1956.
However, for the best known reasons with NHAI, the procedure to get the environment.
Permission (complete with the determination of the provisions of the details of reference and public audience organizations or public consultations) only followed for NH-344M, but not for NH-248BB which, allegedly, includes DDA Road No.
226 in sector 22 and 23, Dwarka, “said the petition …
the association moved SC after his request was rejected by the Delhi High Court.
Challenging HC’s order, the applicant said that HC was wrong in his findings and allowed construction to say that it was not a new road; Therefore there is no new permit needed.
The High Court has been on July 30, rejecting a petition of residents and housing communities who are looking for direction to NHAI to record all permissions / approval must be obtained to carry out construction on residential roads, DDA Road No 226 in sector 22-23, Dwarka in the national capital.
The petition alleged that the High Court was wrong in accepting NHAI’s opinion that the toll road was not a new national highway and thus freed from obtaining a previous environmental permit under the environmental impact assessment notification (EIA), 2006.
“Interstate National Highway, which includes distribution construction In residential areas that are densely populated, it can be developed without the need for a previous environmental permit in terms of item 7 (F) from the schedule to EIA 2006 notification as changed to date and also without requiring a require before.
Receive orders under the laws of water and air Air? “The petition said while asking the Apex court to try this controversial problem.