New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday at the orders of the nine-month-old Delhi High Court which directed Delhi’s police to provide an eyewitness statement VK Jain told Minister Arvind Keilwal, his deputy Saish Mlaas, who had been admired for the alleged attack then the Head of Secretary Delhi Anshu Prakash.
An aggressive attorney Aman Safe Lekhi argues that the court court is legally correct in rejecting a copy of Jain’s statement to people accused because it is part of a diary and no one relies on prosecution.
“The defendant has the right to reliable statements by prosecution and not to those who are part of the diary case,” he said.
Judge D Judge Y Chandrachud and Mr.
Legitimate asked, “What is his loss in giving the witness’ statement to the defendant? However, the defendant must get a fair trial.
Therefore not oral statement, the benefits must be given to the defendant, if not it will not be a trial fair.
“When Lekhi continued with his efforts to impose a technical problem, Bench said,” In our strong criminal justice system, the defendant must get a fair opportunity to defend himself by getting access to all relevant documents and witness statements.
“Lekhi said the defendant Not entitled to see the diary and that only a court can have access to it.
The bench, “the Delhi High Court order is pro-Liberty and we support it.
There is nothing compared.
This case might be a political hot potato, but on advantages, the High Court has given the right order.” The bench dismissed Delhi Petition Police challenged October 21 2020 HC, the order that had asked the trial court to consider Jain’s statement before passing his demands.
The High Court said it was a “main task” of an investigation agent to carry out free and fair investigations and bring to court notifications all the evidence collected.
“The Investigation Agency did not have the power to appreciate evidence, he rested with a court.
As a result, the trial court was directed to consider the statement on February 21, 2018, from VK Jain (Witness), which was part of the ‘diary’ and was placed on the accused record, When passing orders, “said.
Prakash has alleged that he was attacked by AAP MLA with the presence of Kejriwal and Sisodia during the midnight meeting on February 19, 2018, related to the release of advertisements for the government to complete three years.
Kejriwal, Sisodia and nine other AAP MLA were given guarantees by the court of trial.
Two Mlaas – Amanatullah Khan and Prakash Jarwal – Given a guarantee by Delhi HC.
Delhi police have submitted a chargesheet against 13 accused of August 13, 2018.
SC rejected Delhi police petition in the case of assault ex-cs
