New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday refused to entertain the former Minister of Maharashtra Minister Anil Deshmukh for the court to examine the initial CBI investigation report against him suspected of obscuring him.
However, the court allowed him to increase the problem before the right court.
At the beginning of the hearing, Senior Advocate of Kapil Sibal, emerged for Deshmukh, which refers to former Police Commissioner Mumbai Bir Singh who ordered the CBI’s probe which was ordered against the former minister and said the court had passed the trust in him but the police did him escape now.
Judge Judge Sanjay Kishan Kuli and M M Sundresh said, “It is unfortunate for institutions.
This shows a lack of trust in the system.” The bench, after that, continued with the trial on the Deshmukh request and raised a question about how he could approach directly to the top in article 32 jurisdiction.
Sibal argued that SC handed over the commandment of Deshmukh about the assumption that the evidence was found by the CBI after holding an introductory probe and subsequently submitted, but according to media reports, the politician was given a chit in the report.
Sibal argues that the court must ask the CBI to place before 65 pages of the PE report along with the file that records to find out the truth.
He said that if it was true that “nothing was found against me” In the preliminary report it was clear that there was a political motivation behind the Fire Stool Inn, however, raises questions about how much trust can be given to media reports and say it does not tend to Entertaining the petition.
It allows it to increase problems before a competent court.
Deshmukh has approached SC through his lawyer Avadh Kaushik.
“The current petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution is based on the premise that the command is forwarded by the court for the reason that the initial investigation can have material for the applicant.
According to a particular newspaper report, the applicant was declared as a clean Chit applicant.
Therefore, they have been Calling on all records …
We do not tend to use jurisdiction in Article 32 in this scenario.
It is always open to the applicant to increase the issue before a competent court, “said the court.
Deshmukh (71) was arrested by Ed on November 1 after questioning in the case, with the provisions of the prevention of money laundering laws (PMLA).
Ed had initiated an investigation against Deshmukh and his colleagues after the Investigation Bureau (CBI)) filed a crawl against the NCP leader on April 21 this year on charges of corruption and abuse of official positions.
Money laundering kasing against Deshmukh and the others were made after the CBI posted him in a corruption case related to the allegations that the demands of the RS 100 Crore by bribery from the owner of the hotel and the Mumbai restaurant was sought by the former tuning police flattened by former Mumbai Police.
Commissioner of Param Singh.
The ED case is that Deshmukh, while serving as Minister of State House, abusing his official position and through police officers who were dismissed Sachin Waze collected Rs 4.70 Crore from various bars and restaurants in Mumbai.