Panaji: Leader Maharashtra Opposition Devendra Fadnivis said that the Supreme Court’s decision to revoke the suspension of 12 MLA BJP from the assembly for a year was “slap” on the face of the Maharashtra government and in its unconstitutional actions.
Fadniv said that those who did not believe in the Constitution would not be allowed to sit in the speaker seat.
“We want to ask for an apology from the Maharashtra government for his behavior and to keep this 12 MLA suspended for more than six months which is a gross injustice of these people who have chosen 12 MLA.
The government that is not democratic and uncontitual must apologize,” Fadniv said to reporters on Friday.
“I would like to thank the Supreme Court for this historical decision to revoke the 12 mlash suspension suspended by Maharashtra’s legislative.
This is a tight slap against the MVA government that has acted is not constitutional and properly demonstrated by the Supreme Court that they have acted illegally and Not rational, “he said.
Fadniv said that the Maharashtra government had acted unconsitized for a long time and they felt that they were above the constitution and which was why they suspended this 12 MLA for one year based on them.
“This 12 MLA struggles for the Rights of the OBC community and what is described as happened in the speaker room that never happened, but it was narrated at home and on the basis that this 12 MLA was suspended,” he said.
Fadniv said that the Supreme Court was firmly said that wherever the legislature would not respect the constitution, the court would step in.
“I think SC gives a chance to the legislature to improve itself in the last hearing.
It directs 12 MLA to represent themselves in the legislature and allow the legislature to revoke their suspension, but the government that does not respect the constitution does not follow up, so that it allows SC to step into affairs Legislative and SC, today, has canceled the resolution of the Maharashtra Assembly, “opposition leader said.
Fadniv said that SC above all, it was a constitutional guard and if there was a SC decision not fulfilled by the legislature or the government would act as a constitutional solvency.
Reacting to the decision of the Maharashtra government to allow the sale of liquor in supermarkets, Fadnivis said that we must first know the interests of whom this decision has been taken.
“This decision is not for the benefit of farmers.
Some people have started refining and distribution of liquor companies and to benefit such people they have made such decisions,” he said, “we condemned the state government’s decision to make Maharashtra Madhirashtra.”