Mumbai: The Supreme Court said notification of August 11 issued by the Secretary of the Maharashtra Chief which prohibits the selection of by-by-election agencies “there will be no obstacles to the State Election Commission (SEC) to continue to make decisions in accordance with the law”.
Bypolls must be held in six districts for seats which were originally provided for the OBC category.
On March 4, SC has an Upheld OBC quota in the election with a local body in Maharashtra, subject to a 50% cap for SC / ST / OBC which is put together.
The day later, seconds stated the Bypolls to the six zilla parishes and 33 Panchayat Samitis for seats emptied after SC order on a political reservation for OBC.
On June 22, seconds announced elections in five districts – Dhule, Nandurbar, Akola, Washim and Nagpur – because they were at the level 1 sidewalk, but not for Palghar at the level 3.
In July, when the country moved SC quoting a pandemic and looking for The command of delaying polls with six months, SC has requested a set to make a call consider the notification of disaster management authorities and factoring of receivables in a pandemic condition.
The government, has been on August 11, the sidewalks such as relaxing locking in Maharashtra as the case of Covid-19 are under control, but maintaining the ban on elections.
Sec, on September 6, submitted a fresh application before SC in the “Compliance Report ” said it had” resolved partially ” the selection process that has been done.
SEC, through his advocate Ajit Kadethankar, said, “Only if the state government, alone, eliminates election restrictions or if SC directs, the selection process can be resolved.” Sec said it “continuously monitored” the situation as directed by SC and “realized that the situation was quite conducive to continue the election that lasted a long time ”.
On September 9, SC heard the advice of Rahul Chitnis, who was looking for a delay, and SEC Counsel Kadethankar before rejecting delays.
SC Hakim Judge Am Khanwilkar, Hrishikesh Roy and CT Ravikumar, in order, “In our opinion,” In our opinion, there is no need to delay this problem because the country does not say in terms of deciding the date publication and schedule selection.
It is a prerogative of the State Election Commission.
” SC said the state, on August 11 notifications, “could not narrow the direction provided by this court …
in connection with the constituency that has become a consequence of the decision (Him).
”.
It was directed that the SEC could submit a compliance report after 6 Sunday and put the next problem on October 21.