New Delhi: The Supreme Court said that the suppression of SCS and STS by the top caste was “sad reality” but decided that if a fair compromise was achieved between the victim and the defendant before the confidence under the SC-ST actions reached the finality, the Constitutional Court had inherent strength Cancel this case, report Dhananjay Mahapatra.
CJI N V Ramana and Rewis Surya Kant and Hima Kohli canceled the 1994 belief under SC-ST (Prevention of cruelty) acting based on the compromise achieved between prisoners and complaints.
The norms issued to deal with SC / ST Act Caseste SC said, “the action is the recognition of the sad reality that despite doing a few steps, the caste / tribe scheduled to be targeted by various cruelty in the hands of the top caste.” Providing guidelines for all courts in cases that teach SC / SC, Bench, “Usually, when dealing with violations arising from special laws such as ACT SC / ST, the court will be very careful in its approach.
” Cji led bench said, “Where he appeared in court that violations, although covered under the SC / ST law, especially private or civilian, or where alleged violations have not committed due to caste of the victims, or where the continuation of the legal process Will be an abuse of legal processes, the court can use its strength to cancel the process.
“