New Delhi: Taking a strong exception for the “attitude of the reconcilization” at the center appointed a judge in the High Court who worked with more than 40 percent of vacancies, the Supreme Court on Monday told the government in a very clear term not to expect the right adjudication in cases Important cases even in important cases have an economic influence because they do not appoint judges carrying the justice system to stop.
Sanjay bench Sanjay Kiswa Kuli and Hrishikesh Roy struggled to show that the center was indifferent to the decision of the APEX court who had set a timeline for the appointment of judges for the High Court and did not move “did not seem to move the government”.
It made it clear that the government, became the biggest leader.
Surely it must also face the consequences and must bear the burn and adjudicate its crucial cases will be postponed.
Times Viewa which functions smoothly is fundamental for healthy democracy.
But in India, Judicial vacancies have become a lasting problem.
50% vacancies in several high courts are serious concern problems and need to be handled as early as possible.
“If you bring a judicial system to jam, your system will also be jammed and the government must realize it.
You cannot have a time adjuded when the judge is not appointed.
People must get the assessment and adjudicate their disputes on time but people face problems Because of the Locations in the High Court.
If people face problems then you also suffer.
Then you also suffer, “Bench told the center who was seeking early adjudication of the dispute over the anti-dumping procedure on imported solar cells that had lived by HC but posted Case after two and a half months.
The additional lawyer General Madhavi Divan, appeared for the center, said that this problem was too important to be postponed for more than two months and the initial adjudication was needed because it would bind the economy.
Agree with his existence of the importance of the case, the bench, however, said that Delhi HC worked with 50 percent of the force approved and impossible for those who burdened HC to provide early hearing and the government itself blamed for a sad state.
“Let the economy suffer because you don’t put the system in its place.
We agree that there must be a time bound by Ajudication of Disputes but we also pass the verdict for the appointment of the time judge.
But you don’t follow, so we can’t help,” Bench said.
“We cannot press HC to take early cases when there is a shortage of judges.
Government authorities must also realize that this is now how the justice can work.
…
the justice system tries to stop.
We have sympathy.
We have sympathy with you but what can be We do when the government itself does not do what we are intended, ‘said the bench.
According to the latest data, there are 455 jury jobs in HCS from the total strength of 1098 sanctions and the work force is 643.
There are eight jobs in SC from the power of sanctions 34.
The court records That the Delhi High Court will be with judges less than 50% in a week only have 29 judges of the power of 60 judges.
“Given all the judges.” The mentioned above, the government must realize that the initial adjudication of commercial disputes is the need for a number of judges adequate which in turn will require them to follow the schedule which is said in M ​​/ S.
PLR projects Pvt.
Ltd., “(supra).” We faced a problem filed in this petition because the stubborn attitude of the government did not appoint a high court judge for many years together even where the recommendations had been cleaned by the Collegium, “the bench.
Said.
More embarrassing to the center, Senior Advocate Maninder Singh and Soujit lawyers Ghosh, arose against the Plea Center, told the bench that HC was postponing hearing because the center submitted Affidavit and looked for more time and benches “the factual matrix painted a picture that was even more Sorrier from the government’s behavior” holding that the delay in the appointment of the jury has caused “crisis situation” in The High Court because some of them work under 50 percent sanction strength, SC has improved a period of time processing each stage and said that the center could not sit on the names if the reiteration of its recommendations and the appointment was carried out in a month.