New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday postponed a hearing on Prashant Bhushan’s petition against Ashty.
The top yesterday asked him to approach the High Court who would decide on this problem in two weeks.
The petition looks for the center of the center order appoint IPS officers Gujes Gujes Gujes Rakesh Asthana as Commissioner of Police Delhi.
A special bench of three judges from the APEX court, led by the Chairman of Indian Justice (CJI) Nuthalapati Venkata Ramana and also consisted of Judge Dr.
Dhananjaya Yashwant Chandrachud and Surya Kant heard the petition submitted by CPIL.
CPIL, in his request was submitted before the APEX court, looking for directions to stop the order of July 27, 2021, issued by respondents, Union of India (UOI) appointed Rakesh Asthana as Police Commissioner, Delhi.
CPIL, in his petition, said that the direction issued by this court in the case of ‘Prakash Singh’ clearly negotiated asthana’s appointment as a Delhi police commissioner.
“Rule 56 (d) stipulates that” There is no servant of the government given an extension in the ministry outside the sixty-year retirement age “, the petition submitted by the CPIL before the Supreme Court.” The central government has no strength.
Under the rule of 3 of all Indian services (service conditions residay) rules, 1960 for relaxing rules 16 (1) of all Indian services (the benefits of death-cum-retirement) rules, 1958 to provide extension services to Rakesh asthana “petition, copy Accessed by Ani, it was put forward before the Supreme Court by the CPIL said there was a violation of policies regarding inter-career deputation all Indian service officers as determined under the DOPT (Department of Personnel and Training) Memorandum Office, in 2004, said the petition of the month, Petitio N said.
There is no UPSC panel (Union Public Service Commission) formed for the appointment of the Delhi Police Commissioner, and the criteria have a two-year minimum term of office has been ignored, the request is claimed The country and he is the police chief for the NCT of Delhi and therefore, the instructions on the appointment for the DGP post are diluted IT by this court in the case of Prakash Singh must be followed by the central government while making an appointment.
The meeting of the high-powered committee was held on May 24, 2021, the central government’s efforts to appoint the same IPS officers, because the CBI director was reportedly rejected by the Chairman of the Head of India by quoting the “six-month regulation” as referred to in Prakash Singh, said the petition.
“There is no extension of services that can be legally given to respondents 2, (asthana) beyond the sixty-year retirement age, and the extension has been given Vide Order July 27, 2021, is truly illegal, violating fundamental rules 56,” the Petitioner said , and beg from the Supreme Court that the command July 27 is responsible for being set aside.
– (with input from agency)
SC was delayed to hear Prashant Bhushan’s request against Asthana
