Nagpur: Reacting to the Statement of the Minister of State for Varsha Gaikwad about the Ordinance of the Proposal to Overcome Controversy Cost, School Guardians said the government made “populist” decisions.
None of them wanted to speak officially until the rules were issued, and they said the state government was only inviting litigation.
The guardian of the Budget School said the government “harmed itself” with such steps.
“Think about why private schools have developed over the past two decades.
This is a clear message from parents that they prefer private schools for those run by the government,” they said.
Wali Mandanyat added, “Why will they reject free education and receive entrance tickets where thousands, if not lakh, must be paid every year.
Parents march to collect the form of reception and pull the string to secure the chair, while the government school strives for reception.” Trustees further said that the government harmed itself because if the school functions under coercion, they will only close and crores students will drop from the education system.
“Does the government have the capacity to absorb so many students?” A Western Maharashtra Guardian said, “Dozens of schools in all states have approached the court on this issue.
If the government plans to cut everyone and directly advance with regulations, it will cause chaos.” Other Trusters, who manage CBSE schools , said government intervention in cost problems contradicts “spirit cooperation”.
“Private schools work with the government to help improve educational bars.
Students enroll in private schools because they feel better value-added benefits will increase to their children,” Trustee said.
To provide such benefits, Trustees added, “Schools need to invest in infrastructure, hire the best talent and also constantly improve to maintain standards.
But if the government is forcibly trying to intervene in cost problems, the majority of schools will die.” Although it is not known what the regulation actually, Minister Gaikwad did confirm that the main concern is a country that has no authority to intervene in cost problems.
Therefore, it is expected that the regulation can empower educational officials to handle cost disputes.