New Delhi: In the setback to the speaker of the West Bengal Assembly, the Supreme Court on Monday did not result in his request to stay in the direction of Calcutta High Court for a quick decision about the leader of BJP Suvendu Adhikari, a five-month petition that was looking for disqualification of beating Roy – who defected BJP to TMC After the last pounding victory in the assembly poll.
Appearing for the speaker, senior advocate A M Singhvi employs every gray area recognized by the Supreme Court in a landmark assessment to argue that justice and legislative must respect each other.
He faced a difficult task of convincing LN Rao and Hima Kohli justice, which reminded him of SC assessment in a case related to the MLAS defect from Congress to BJP and the APEX court asked Manipur’s speaker to decide within three months of disqualification of petition under the Law of Anti-defense .
Bench said, “Because the petition who was looking for Roy’s disqualification was registered to hear before the speaker on December 21, he would decide according to the law.” Singhvi said, “The order gave the impression that the speaker had to hear and decide the disqualification petition on December 21 itself.
The speaker must hear the applicant, the other side and then make a decision.” Bench said, “…
We know what hearings will be given.
This is not a case where evidence must be recorded and other processes must be followed.
Do it quickly.” Singhvi continued to persuade the bench to “give speaker several elbow spaces” to make decisions after the right hearing on the disqualification petition.