Prasagraj: Refusing a Guarantee Tree A person accused of raping his girlfriend together with other defendants, the High Court of Allahabad said that “having consensual sex with a big girl is not a violation, but unethical, immoral, and against established Indian norms”.
Justice Rahul Chaturvedi, said that he rejected Plea guarantees Raju, one of the accused in this case, said that it was the duty of the person who claimed to be the girl’s girlfriend to protect her sexually sexy boyfriend by co -Dituduh.
“When the Petitioner proposed that the victim was his lover, it was his task that binded to protecting his dignity, honor and reputation of his girlfriend.
If a girl is the main, then to have sex with his approval is not a violation, but of course it is unethical and immoral and also Not in consentance with established social norms from the Indian society, “the court was observed.
The court ended the Applicant’s actions as “very sad and inappropriate than a boyfriend”, stating that “he remained a silent audience when the people were accused brutally killed his lover in front of him and there was no effort to put a rigid resistance.
It was made by him so that the soul And the victim’s body can be saved from further massacre by this meat nasar “.
On February 20, 2021, a FIR was submitted against four accused of 376-D, 392, 323, 504, and 506 of Indian criminal codes and parts 5 and 6 act pocso at the Akil Sarai police station Kaushambi Regency.
In accordance with FIR, the victim, around 8 in the morning of February 19, went to take the stitching lesson at the center of the stitch and had spoken with his girlfriend Raju by telephone and planned to meet him.
Then they met in a remote place near the local river.
After some time, three other people arrived there, harassing and beating Raju applicants and grabbed their cellphones and committed a crime with the victim.
After checking the material placed on the note and ISI FIR, the court in his decision dated October 21, denied guarantees to the applicant, stating that it could not be said with certainty that the applicant had no relationship with the remaining people left.