Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday was dismissed with a guarantee application proposed by Indrani Mukerjea in the case of Sheena Bora’s murder.
On Monday Judge Nitin Sambed after hearing his advice there Raes Khan at that time asked him to take instructions from the Indrani in a byculla woman’s prison and inform Tuesday whether he wanted to pull the application guarantee.
He returned on Tuesday to say Indrani Mukerjea wanted to invite orders about this case service.
In other words he doesn’t want to attract his request.
Judge Sambre on Monday said, “In the advantages I am not sure .
His body is said CBI then burned and dumped in the woods in Pena, District Raigad.
Indrani has denied all the charges and face trial.
He tends to challenge the refusal of bail before the Supreme Court now.
Khan Submitting that it was a plea first guarantee of Indrani, 50, on Advantages before HC.
It must be delivered that it has a good case for guarantees on the benefits that refer to various “contradictions, negligence and inconsistencies’ in the case and evidence so far against their clients.
He argued that the CBI did not have a case in achievement and cited the command of the Supreme Court, said because he was a woman, it was in prison because “six years as a pre-trial punishment” without ending with the court.
, it is a case that is fit for guarantees.
KH said when together accused and Rahul’s father, Peter Mukerjea could be given a guarantee, because he had last February, so did Indrani.
He said only 67 witnesses had been examined so far and the CBI has 18 more to go, regardless of the possibility of witnesses and defense trials can take place, so as to ignore his fundamental rights.
Khan also said even in the courtyard of the bail health may be given as a report of the latest September 2021 Indrani from the JJ Hospital said he had non-changed neurological conditions, so it requires maintenance.
Khan said, “All hinges of hinges in the story of Shyamwar Rai approver.
He was arrested two days before him, in possession of weapons.
He denied such ownership and then destroyed his credibility and because of the foundation of the case of collapse It is a witness of the State.
Khan also quotes deposits by doctors and experts to argue that the framework and teeth remained such as the skull excavated in 2015 after August 25, 2015 was arrested from the pen and found in 2012 by the police pen in Raigad was not the same.
The skull in 2015 was “whole” while the 2012 skull has an incision that shows that “the CBI sashed it” Rahul’s text message stipulates that Sheena Bora is still hi DUP Five Months After Alleged His Death, “Khan said and also that the report after Mortem said” the cause of death.
“Prosecutor CBI Patil with DP Singh who submitted a detailed reply said his first guarantee application was rejected in 2017 and then four times and” There were no changes in Circumstancy.
” Detailed Affidavit CBI said the allegations were framed in January 2017 and the call was issued for Rahul Mukerjea, Peter Mukerjea’s son was accused of “but due to national locking (for Covid-19) proof of prosecution detained since March 2020.” The court continued on February 17, 2021 and “Rahul Mukerjea will be proven to be the motive for the murder and also that he dropped Sheena Bora near the Amarsons Showroom, National College, Khar at 6:30 a.m.
at 24.04.2012.
” The CBI in the answer said, “Nature and gravity of violations carried out by A-1 (Indrani Mukerjea) are very serious and it attracts the death penalty.” The prosecution expressed “has a strong concern for this case, accused of being released on a guarantee, he might be Abcond which will seriously inhibit the ongoing trial “after detailing evil and having adequate evidence.
Sheena Bora Murder: HC rejects the indrani bail tree
