Nagpur: The Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court on Friday directing all court trials to dispose of cases related to the marketing of Black Remdesivir, used to treat covid patients who are critically ill, in achievement as soon as possible.
“We issued this direction with the expectations of the expression” as soon as possible “it will not be misunderstood as a limited time administration of this problem.
The direction has been passed again because the deadline set before by this court has seen the expiration again,” said the division bench consisting of judges Sunil Shukre and Justice Anil Kior.
While throwing away the application of Suo Motu about the delay in completing trials related to the Remdesivir black marketing case, a reliable bench in the investigation report submitted by the Judge and Affidavit sessions submitted by Amicus Curiae Shread Bhandarkar, who clarified that the chairman officer did not have a role in delay , But it is due to various factors.
“Overall, after being considered Judge Session report, Roznamas of all cases, and also the written statement of Amicus, we found that there were no errors that could be placed on the shoulder of one of the chairman officers in conducting trials,” said the judges said.
“No doubt, the Maharashtra government obeys the direction issued by the HC in appointing a special prosecutor (Jyoti Vajani) without delay.
However, such a quick step is not proven effective in the face of the various challenges that arise and handled by chaircers, some of which are narrated Previously, “he added.
On June 22, HC has expressed sadness over the delay in the trial and ordered the investigation of the “finding facts” of the former sessions and judges today, leading them.
On Friday, the judges said after going through the judge’s report and also a copy of the daily order sheet, they found that there were several factors that contributed to delays in the disposal of several cases committed to being quite well by judicial judges for the judge concerned.
“One factor shows that the HC’s order was challenged by several accused before the Supreme Court.
Even though the person accused of not placing the details of every detail of the challenge made before the trial court, quite natural for the chairman officers to hesitate to continue the trial,” they said.